Generically - Judgment Search Results

Generics (Uk) Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. H Lundbeck a/S (Resp ...

Court: House of Lords

..... the therapeutic effect of citalopram as an ssri lay in the enantiomer which has the generic name escitalopram subsequent research has now established that the enantiomer actually inhibits the therapeutic effect ..... under the brand name cipralex since 2002 these proceedings 65 the three appellants generics uk ltd arrow generics ltd and teva uk ltd and teva pharmaceutical industries ltd all wish to .....

Mahavir Generics Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC54

..... under an agreement dated 1 1 97 with m s cipla limited manufacturer of pharmaceutical generic products appellant had been functioning as their consignment agent for sale of their products throughout .....

Universal Generics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1993LC190(Bombay); 1993(68)ELT27(Bom)

pendse j 1 by this petition filed under article 226 of the constitution the petitioners are challenging legality of show...

Universal Generics (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1989)31ITD369(Mum.)

1 in this appeal the assessee is contesting the action of the commissioner of income tax appeals in not granting...

Brooke Group Ltd. Vs. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to preserve supracompetitive profits on branded cigarettes by pressuring liggett to raise its generic cigarette prices through a process of tacit collusion with the other cigarette ..... williamson succeeded in bringing about oligopolistic price coordination and supracompetitive prices in the generic category sufficient to slow its growth thereby preserving supracompetitive branded profits and recouping .....

Ftc Vs. Actavis, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... inc then known as watson pharmaceuticals filed an abbreviated new drug application for a generic drug modeled after androgel subsequently paddock laboratories also a respondent separately filed an ..... join dissenting nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp solvay pharmaceuticals holds a patent it sued two generic drug manufacturers that it alleged were infringing that patent those companies counterclaimed contending .....

Glickman Vs. Wileman Brothers and Elliott, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... power to regulate interstate commerce provides abundant support for the marketing orders constitutionality generic advertising is intended to stimulate consumer demand for an agricultural product in a ..... because they might earn more money in an unregulated market respondents criticisms of generic advertising provide no basis for concluding that factually accurate advertising constitutes an abridgment .....

Gonzales Vs. Duenas-alvare

Court: US Supreme Court

..... duenas alvarez was convicted the federal government claiming that the conviction was for a generic theft offense began removal proceedings a federal immigration judge agreeing with the government that ..... duenas alvarez argues that the california vehicle code provision in other ways reaches beyond generic theft to cover certain nongeneric crimes duenas alvarez points out that california defines aiding .....

Pliva, Inc. Vs. Mensing

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 27 1998 footnote 3 today they dominate the market see expanding the use of generic drugs 2 generic drugs constituted 75 percent of all dispensed prescription drugs in 2009 ninety percent of ..... and they may well cause the states to rethink their longstanding efforts to promote generic use through generic substitution laws see brief for national conference of state legislators as amicus curiae 15 .....

Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. Vs. Novo Nordisk a/S

Court: US Supreme Court

..... wont accepted the listing at its word and accord ingly declined to approve a generic product the generic manufacturer sued to delete the improper listing from the orange book but the federal ..... statutory scheme in other words contemplates that one patented use will not foreclose marketing a generic drug for other unpatented ones within that framework the counterclaim naturally functions to challenge .....