Generically - Judgment Search Results

Mahavir Generics Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC54

..... under an agreement dated 1 1 97 with m s cipla limited manufacturer of pharmaceutical generic products appellant had been functioning as their consignment agent for sale of their products throughout .....

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh

Reported in: (2004)(2)SLJ311CAT

in the office of resident commissioner new delhi and director general of police enforcement and vigilance h p to join in

Som Dutt Builders Ltd. Vs. Smt. Phool Kumari, Wife of Late Manbirender ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2004(74)DRJ626

conduct or commonsense knowledge tells us that coronary insufficiency is generally the consequence of strain extra work fatigue in any event

Devinder Singh Puri Vs. Mr. B.N. Rampal

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2004)138PLR591

by the court to offer assistance has responded positively and generously and therefore the interest of the party in person who

Andhra Pradesh Forest Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [2005]144TAXMAN51(AP)

taxation statutes machinery provisions are to be interpreted liberally and generously so long as the principal object of the provision is

Andhra Pradesh Forest Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commi ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (2005)195CTR(AP)81; [2005]272ITR245(AP)

taxation statutes machinery provisions are to be interpreted liberally and generously so long as the principal object of the provision is

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Represented by Its Divisional Ma ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: II(2005)ACC205; 2006ACJ757; 2004(6)ALT385

1962 1scr929 wherein the apex court has held that the general principle is that the actual pecuniary loss can be ascertained

Kowalski Vs. Tesmer

Court: US Supreme Court

of the concerns underlying the court s prudential criteria the general prohibition against third party standing frees the court not only

Vimal Arakkal Vs. Corporation of Cochin

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2004(3)KLT413

of building as per the rules the petitioner notices is generously wider than that had been given by the definition in

Merind Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(173)ELT422Tri(Mum.)bai

..... heading and is being used in the manufacture of the branded and generic injections 4 the appellants were issued a notice dated 6 8 ..... 10 96 ce and being captively used in the manufacture of unbranded generic injections and that claim is being made even to day by the ..... such d 21 was taken for captive consumption in the manufacture of generic injections since these d 21 was obtained from inputs on which .....