Generic Name - Judgment Search Results

Universal Generics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1993LC190(Bombay); 1993(68)ELT27(Bom)

Pendse, J. 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners are challenging legality of show cause notice dated December 26, 1983 and corrigendum to show cause notice dated December, 26, 1983....

Mahavir Generics Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC54

of liability to pay service tax.2. Under an agreement dated 1.1.97 with M/s. Cipla Limited, manufacturer of pharmaceutical generic products, appellant had been functioning as their consignment agent for sale of their products throughout India. When service … an alleged forwarding agent who receives goods for transit, issues bills of lading, makes contracts in his own name for carriage, is as to a person with whom he contracts for the delivery of goods, a 'common

Universal Generics (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1989)31ITD369(Mum.)

1. In this appeal the assessee is contesting the action of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in not granting refund of the entire tax paid by it.2. The assessee is a private limited company. The assessment...

Generics (Uk) Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. H Lundbeck a/S (Resp ...

Court: House of Lords

an organic compound which was first synthesised by the respondent, H. Lundbeck A/S, in 1972. The compound, whose generic name is citalopram, was patented by the respondent, but that patent expired many years ago. Citalopram was found to … the whole of the therapeutic effect of citalopram as an SSRI lay in the (+)-enantiomer, which has the generic name escitalopram. Subsequent research has now established that the (-)-enantiomer actually inhibits the therapeutic effect of the (+)-enantiomer. 64.

Sri Rajendra Pharmaceuticals, vs M/S Navrtan Generics

Court: Karnataka

NO.1519, TRIDAL COMPLEX, MARUTHI GALLI, BELGAUM - 606 638. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.S. NAGARAJA., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S NAVRTAN GENERICSDigitally signed PROPRIETOR: SRI GAUTHAM KUMAR, by NO.115/3, 2ND FLOOR, NARAYANAPPA NAHAR TOWR, B.T.STREET,LAKSHMAMMA SULTANPET CROSS, Location: HIGH COURT … with one of the documents being claimed to be a discharge of the amounts due to the respondent, namely, a Bank statement indicating payment of a sum of Rs.24,118/- to the respondent. On that basis, learned counsel