Generic - Judgment Search Results
Universal Generics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-08-1993
Reported in: 1993LC190(Bombay); 1993(68)ELT27(Bom)
Pendse, J. 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners are challenging legality of show cause notice dated December 26, 1983 and corrigendum to show cause notice dated December, 26, 1983....
Mahavir Generics Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2004
Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC54
of liability to pay service tax.2. Under an agreement dated 1.1.97 with M/s. Cipla Limited, manufacturer of pharmaceutical generic products, appellant had been functioning as their consignment agent for sale of their products throughout India. When service
Universal Generics (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-12-1989
Reported in: (1989)31ITD369(Mum.)
1. In this appeal the assessee is contesting the action of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in not granting refund of the entire tax paid by it.2. The assessee is a private limited company. The assessment...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Generics (Uk) Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. H Lundbeck a/S (Resp ...
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Feb-25-2009
company H Lundbeck A/S (‘Lundbeck’) but expired several years ago. Since then it has been sold in its generic form by a number of manufacturers. 2. Citalopram is a racemate, consisting of equal numbers of two molecules
Sri Rajendra Pharmaceuticals, vs M/S Navrtan Generics
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-18-2024
NO.1519, TRIDAL COMPLEX, MARUTHI GALLI, BELGAUM - 606 638. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.S. NAGARAJA., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S NAVRTAN GENERICSDigitally signed PROPRIETOR: SRI GAUTHAM KUMAR, by NO.115/3, 2ND FLOOR, NARAYANAPPA NAHAR TOWR, B.T.STREET,LAKSHMAMMA SULTANPET CROSS, Location: HIGH COURT
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free