General Publication - Judgment Search Results

General Public of Saproon Valley and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Himachal P ...

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1993HP52

OBI October 10, 1988 by, what is described as, 'the General Public of Saproon Valley through its President Murlidhar Sharma' along activities...... the mining industry became identified in many places in public mind, as a major source of damage to the environment.

General Public Utilities Corp. Vs. Susquehanna Valley Alliance

Court: US Supreme Court

VALLEY ALLIANCE , 449 U.S. 1096 (1981) 449 U.S. 1096 GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORPORATION et al. v. SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY ALLIANCE et ALLIANCE - 449 U.S. 1096 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. v. SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY ALLIANCE , 449 U.S. 1096

***** Vs. General Public

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Kumar as his legal heir. The suit was against the general public. The defendant was proceeded against ex parte on 22.7.2010. the Newspaper on 12.3.2010. It appears that the DDR and publication in the Newspaper in the month of March 2010, just

General Public Through Dalip Singh Vs. Gurcharan Singh and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CHANDIGARH CR No.2402 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.08.2014 General Public through Dalip Singh ....Petitioner Versus Gurcharan Singh and others CR No.2402 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.08.2014 General Public through Dalip Singh ....Petitioner Versus Gurcharan Singh and others ....Respondents

indrawati Vs. General Public and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of 2013(O&M) Date of decision: 21.2. 2014 Indrawati ......petitioner Versus General Public and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Ravinder 2013(O&M) Date of decision: 21.2. 2014 Indrawati ......petitioner Versus General Public and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Ravinder Malik,

Smt. Bhagya Wati JaIn and Another Vs. General Public and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1995P& H201

the Will and has received substantial benefit under it, that generally is treated as a suspicious circumstance attending the execution of execution. It appears that after attesting the Will, the Notary Public asked her Clerk to get the endorsement typed and appears

Date of Decision: 28.1.2014 Vs. General Public

Court: Punjab and Haryana

2014 Date of Decision: 28.1.2014 Samadh Nanu Singh ....Petitioner Versus General Public ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present:Mr.Baldev Singh,Advocate the application under Order 6 Rule 17 could have ordered publication in order to do substantial justice. In view of the

Raj Kumari Dhawan Vs. General Public and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2004)138PLR142

also been filed for dispensing with the notification to the general public claiming that already a public notice has been published been filed for dispensing with the notification to the general public claiming that already a public notice has been published on

Fao No.186 of 2012 Vs. the General Public and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

HUDA, Panipat. Notice of the petition was issued to the General Public by publication in the newspaper. No one filed any of the petition was issued to the General Public by publication in the newspaper. No one filed any objection to the

Decided on 24.09.2013 Vs. General Public

Court: Punjab and Haryana

AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.1358 OF2006DECIDED ON2409.2013 Manohar Singh ..............Appellant versus General Public .............Respondent CORAM HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.S.SARON HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.P.BANGARH Present:- was given to the General Public (respondent) by way of publication in the newspaper 'Chardi Kalan' but no one appeared for