Gap - Judgment Search Results

The Gap Inc and ors. Vs. Praveen K. JaIn and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2001(58)DRJ69

The Plaintiff has filed this suit for a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendants from using the trade mark GAP in respect of denim jeans, readymade garments or any other allied and cognate goods or any other similar

M/S. Gap International Sourcing (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cst, Delhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi

Rakesh Kumar, J. 1. The appellant are a company registered in India and are subsidiary of M/s GAP International Sourcing, Inc., U.S.A. who are a prominent retailer in U.S.A. and other countries. The appellant entered into

Bell's Gap R. Co. Vs. Pennsylvania

Court: US Supreme Court

Bell's Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania - 134 U.S. 232 (1890) U.S. Supreme Court Bell's Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania,

Karnataka State Private College Stop-gap Lecturers Association Vs. Sta ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1992SC677; JT1992(1)SC373; 1992LabIC575; (1993)IILLJ831SC; 1992(1)SCALE198; (1992)2SCC29; [1992]1SCR397; 1992(1)SLJ215(SC); 1992(1)LC521(SC); (1992)2UPLBEC1110

R.M. Sahai, J.1. Teachers appointed temporarily for three months or less, by privately managed degree colleges receiving cent per cent grants-in-aid, controlled administratively and financially by the Education Department of the State of Karnataka, seek regularisation...

New India Assurance Company and Another Vs. M/S. Action Bridge Gap Con ...

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Matched in: Parties New India Assurance Company and Another Vs. M/S. Action Bridge Gap Construction Pvt. Ltd. and Another

Old Navy (itm) Inc. and ors., Vs. Deepa Surekha and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2007(99)DRJ577; LC2007(3)528; 2008(37)PTC197(Del)

in the three suits have filed similar claims alleging infringement and passing off in respect of registered trademarks GAP, Old Navy and Banana Republic in respect of apparels. Further, it is the case of the plaintiffs that