G P V For - Judgment Search Results
G.P.V.A. Subrhmanyam and ors. Vs. Commissioner, Corporation of Hyderab ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-1969
Reported in: AIR1970AP332
be to run counter to well-known principles of statutory construction.5. In Rawatmal v. Commr. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, (1965) 2 Andh LT 445 Gopalkrishnan Nair, … Schedule H are, 'Grain of all sorts', 'Flour of all sorts', 'Wines and Spirits', 'Beer', 'Sugar', 'molasses and gur', 'ghee' 'Ghee substitutes'. 'Timber', 'Plywood', 'Firewood', 'Charcoal', 'Tea', 'Coal', 'Dates', 'Cement', 'Iron and Steel', 'Paper', and under the … Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. This Writ Petition came up for hearing before one of us in the first instance and was referred to a Division
G.P.V.A. Subrahmanyam Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-10-1964
Reported in: [1967]20STC285(AP)
horticultural produce.5. In Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income- tax and Sales Tax v. A. P. Raman [1960] 11 S.T.C. 263, the High Court of Kerala … P. Chandra Reddy, C.J.1. The only question that arises in this revision case is whether cocoanut is a horticultural … case is whether cocoanut is a horticultural produce or not, for purposes of Rule 5(2)(f) of the Hyderabad General Sales Tax Rules.2. It is argued by Shri Rama Rao that cocoanuts in this case do not fall
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free