Futurist - Judgment Search Results
Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2015
DELHI Judgment Reserved on: April 07, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: April 17, 2015 % + FAO(OS) 391/2012 HIMACHAL FUTURISTIC COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Bishwajit Bhattacharya, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sumant De and Mr.Chandrashekhar Bhattacharya, Advocates versus
Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd. Vs. Uoi and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2012
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL) 1. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 4.7.2007. The learned Single Judge by virtue of the impugned judgment has sustained the award dated 30.3.2007. 2....
Futuristics Offshore Services and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Oil and Natural G ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-28-2012
an application shall be filed before the arbitrator to terminate the proceedings: “GBL and GAL (now known as Futuristic Offshore Services and Chemicals Ltd)., and ONGC shall file joint application before Arbitrators to terminate the proceedings. GBL
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Futuristics Offshore Services and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Oil and Natural G ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-28-2012
an application shall be filed before the arbitrator to terminate the proceedings: âGBL and GAL (now known as Futuristic Offshore Services and Chemicals Ltd)., and ONGC shall file joint application before Arbitrators to terminate the proceedings. GBL
Futuristic Solutions Ltd. Vs. Nirmal Promoters (P) Ltd. and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2016
(approximately 12350 sq. yd, hereafter "suit property"). The fourth and fifth respondents were shareholders and Directors of Nirmal. Futuristic claimed that the second and third defendant acted for and on behalf of Nirmal. The suit alleged that
Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-21-2003
Reported in: (2004)186CTR(HP)374,[2003]264ITR629(HP)
V.K. Gupta C. J. 1. An order dated January 28, 2003, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'B', in I.T.A. Nos. 626 and 627 Chandigarh of 1997, assessment years 1992-93 and 1993-94, was chal-lenged...
Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd. and Others Vs. K.C. Aggarwal a ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (in short, the State Commission) in Appeal No. A-675 of 2002 “ Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd. Vs. K.C. Aggarwal and Ors. and K. Gopalakrishna Nayak and Ors. Vs. Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd.
Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd. and Others Vs. K.C. Aggarwal a ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (in short, the State Commission) in Appeal No. A-675 of 2002 “ Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd. Vs. K.C. Aggarwal and Ors. and K. Gopalakrishna Nayak and Ors. Vs. Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd.
Himachal Futuristic Vs. C.C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-1997
Reported in: (1997)(92)ELT648TriDel
1. The above appeal has been filed against the order of the Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh, disallowing Modvat credit of a sum of Rs. 85,53,993/- taken by the appellants on certain testing equipments during the...
Himachal Futuristic Vs. Commr. of Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2002
Reported in: (2003)(151)ELT628TriDel
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the impugned order-in-appeal dated 8-7-2002 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) vide which he has rejected the refund claim of the appellants as time barred.2....
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free