Furtherer - Judgment Search Results
Without Any Further Delay Writ Petition Was Filed. Vs. State of Haryan ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-20-2013
the anomaly came to his notice, a representation was made to the Competent Authority and thereafter without any further delay, writ petition was filed. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the considered view
“In Furtherance of Order Passed by This Court on Vs. Vs.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-10-2014
the petitioner is the brother of the husband of the deceased and has been residing separately. It is further argued that the marriage of the brother of the petitioner and deceased was solemnized more than 6 years
“i Am Further of the View That there Has to Be Some Vs. State of Har ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
phone as also a country made pistol .315 bore along with 4 cartridges have been recovered. It has further been observed that if benefit of Kanchan 2014.04.12 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“further as Noted by the Commissioner the Civil Court Also Held Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-15-2014
CWP-11821-2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 1- CWP No.11821 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: May 15, 2014 Balwinder Singh & others ...Petitioners Versus Financial Commissioner (Appeals-I) Punjab & others...
“it Is Further Worthwhile to Notice That the Vs. the State of Punjab ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
of Police, Tarn Taran whereby the extreme penalty of dismissal from service has been imposed upon him. Still further, challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 15.3.2010, Annexure P16, whereby the statutory appeal
Considering the Aforesaid Fact Prima Facie No Case for Further Vs. Moh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh Considering the aforesaid fact, prima facie, no case for further enhancement is made out. However, as counsel for the appellants is not present, the appeals are dismissed in
Cwp No.20076 of 2013 Vs. State of Punjab and Others). He Further Submi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
by this court in CWP No.l6795 of 2009 (M/s Pooja Rice Mills versus State of Punjab and others).He further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied,in case respondent no.2 is directed to consider and CWP No.20076 of
Since This Court Has Further Enhanced the Amount of Vs. the Greater Mo ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
vs State of Punjab, decided on 1.5.2012, whereby the compensation for the land acquired vide same notification was further enhanced to @ ` 19,85,700/- per acre. VARINDER SINGH201408.11 10:18 RFA No.4304 of 2011 [2].I attest to the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free