Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Funge - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 07 1884

Winchester and Partridge Mfg. Co. Vs. Funge

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-07-1884

Winchester & Partridge Mfg. Co. v. Funge - 109 U.S. 651 (1884) U.S. Supreme Court Winchester & Partridge Mfg. Co. v. Funge, 109 U.S. 651


Dec 12 2025

LI and Fung (India) Private Limited vs Union of India

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-12-2025

2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 13502 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN: LI AND FUNG (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED A REGISTERED COMPANY, HAVING ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN BANGALORE AT 33/5, 1st FLOOR , REAR


Dec 16 2013

Li and Fung India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-16-2013

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:08. 07.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:16. 12.2013 % + ITA3062012 LI AND FUNG INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Jain, Mr. Manish Kanth


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 08 2017

Li & Fung India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2017

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:08. 03.2017 W.P. (C) 11596/2016, CM APPL.45660-61/2016 LI & FUNG INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Jain and Mr. Manish


Apr 02 2008

Li and Fung India P.Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-02-2008

Reported in: (2008)216CTR(Del)252; [2008]305ITR105(Delhi)

V.B. Gupta, J.1. The following substantial question of law arises in the present appeal: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the present case, assessed is eligible for deduction under Section 80-O of the Income Tax...


May 29 1922

Ng Fung Ho Vs. White

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-29-1922

Ng Fung Ho v. White - 259 U.S. 276 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court Ng Fung Ho v. White, 259 U.S.


May 22 2006

Addl. Cit^*, Spl. Range-4, New Vs. Li and Fung India (P) Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: May-22-2006

section 80-O could be allowed. With reference to the only agreement with sister concern of assessee Li & Fung, the learned Senior Departmental Representative pointed out that composite payment @ 4% of export purchase (page 10 of


May 22 2006

Additional Commissioner of Vs. Li and Fung India (P.) Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: May-22-2006

Reported in: (2007)104ITD75(Delhi)

Section 80-O could be allowed. With reference to the only agreement with sister concern of assessee Li & Fung, the learned Sr. D.R. pointed out that composite payment @ 4% of export purchase (page 10 of the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial