Fundamental Right - Judgment Search Results
Collusion Between Respondents No.1 and 2 (iii) there Is a Fundamental ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-05-2014
respondent No.1 is a result of fraud and collusion between respondents No.1 & 2, (iii) there is a fundamental breach PUSHPINDER SAINI201408.07 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh of
Prof. Hapugahange Ranjith Wimalanath Dharmaratne and Others Institute ...
Court: Sri Lanka Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
and determine any question relating to the infringement or imminent infringement by executive or administrative action of any fundamental right or language right declared and recognized by Chapter III or Chapter IV.?(Italics added) It is important to observe … letter signed by the Chief Accountant and General Manager of the said company in alleged violation of his fundamental right to equality, and a preliminary objection was taken that the application should be dismissed in limine, as the
Arun Vasantrao Betkekar Vs. Government of India (Department of Atomic ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-15-2009
Reported in: (2010)ILLJ266Bom
of this Court in to the various complaints/representations made by him about the functioning of Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (hereinafter referred to as the 'Institute') and other Research Institutions and further to quash and set aside … and the grounds for such extension are recorded in writing.Provided also that the Appropriate Authority shall have the right to terminate the extension of service before the expiry of such extension by giving a notice in writing
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free