Skip to content


Function - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: function Sorted by: old Year: 1984 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.047 seconds)
Jan 01 1984 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Purewal and Associates Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-01-1984

Reported in: (1987)(31)ELT457TriDel

..... engineer employed by the respondents gave a detailed description of the functions of each of the four articles under consideration with the ..... of showing that they did not perform the basic function of fastening but functioned in different ways 16 the lid screw as explained ..... that the screws must be fasteners or must perform a fastening function shri tayal submitted that the tariff entry did not refer .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1984

James Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1984

..... is whether midkiff s statement though not aimed at james should be viewed as the functional equivalent of interrogation in these circumstances because midkiff should have known that the statement ..... viewed as the product of compulsion produced by coercive pressures that were at least the functional equivalent of direct questioning under innis only if sergeant midkiff could not reasonably have .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1984

Alvord Vs. Wainwright

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1984

..... attempt to persuade his client is reasonable this result renders meaningless defense counsel s vital function as an adviser counsel must ensure that the client has access to information relevant to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1984

Hamilton Vs. Zant

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1984

..... brought before the jury the victim s propensity towards violence in short had defense counsel functioned anywhere within the range of professional conduct expected of attorneys it is indeed reasonably probable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1984

New Jersey Vs. T.L.O.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1984

..... prosecutor believes no guidance from this court is necessary i believe that the adversary process functions most effectively when we rely on the initiative of lawyers rather than the activism of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1984

Heiney Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1984

..... conform to traditional legal categories the weight assigned to any element can only be a function of the values of the community for certainly there is no objective formula once a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 1984 (HC)

Bhadreswar Tanti Vs. S.N. Choudhury and anr.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Jan-02-1984

..... to time be referred or assigned to him by the governor and to discharge the functions conferred on him by or under the constitution or any other law for the time .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1984 (TRI)

Jayant Paper Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-03-1984

Reported in: (1984)(16)ELT528TriDel

..... the bitumen because as a sizing material it performs a well understood and an important function in the construction of paper even the presence of a colouring matter which adds nothing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1984 (HC)

K. Ramaswami Gounder Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-03-1984

Reported in: (1984)41CTR(Mad)204; [1987]163ITR94(Mad)

..... a prohibition against payment of any honoraria to judges for taking up and performing other functions on the question whether the sum of rs 20 000 was liable to be taxed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 06 1984 (TRI)

S. Raman Paramakudi Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jan-06-1984

..... is created he is a collector he does not cease to be collector when he functions under the gold control act it is pertinent to note that in the notification relied ..... 2 5 and 6 of section 129 c of the customs act 1962 in the functioning of the tribunal in central excise cases section 35 d ii of the central excises .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //