Function - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: function Sorted by: old Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 616 results (0.03 seconds)Schlesinger Vs. Laird
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1972
..... unless they are advised of the considerations underlying the action under review t he orderly functioning of the process of review requires that the grounds upon which the administrative agency acted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTScenic Hudson Preservation Conference Vs. Federal Power
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1972
..... the fact remains that congress and the public are entitled to know those judgments one function of the 102 statement is certainly to make explicit the priorities of the agencies that ..... means consistent with other essential considerations of national policy to improve and coordinate federal plans functions programs and resources to the end that the nation may 1 fulfill the responsibilities of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSarnoff Vs. Shultz
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1972
..... political question although each has one or more elements which identify it as essentially a function of the separation of powers prominent on the surface of any case held to involve .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoseph Vs. U.S.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1972
..... s rationale or their discretion for that of the board is incompatible with the orderly function of the process of judicial review such action would not vindicate but would deprecate the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWeaver Vs. Hutson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1972
..... reorganization under 77 because the forfeiture would deprive the interstate commerce commission of its statutory function the court was careful to distinguish finn finn v meighan supra involved the forfeiture of ..... was not complicated by any provision of ch x giving to an administrative agency the functions entrusted to the interstate commerce commission under 77 as we stated in palmer v massachusetts .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRosenfeld Vs. New Jersey
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1972
..... u s 518 1972 the important underlying aspect of these cases goes really to the function of law in preserving ordered liberty civilized people refrain from taking the law into their .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOlff Vs. East Side Union High School District
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1972
..... the child reside first in the parents whose page 404 u s 1042 1043 primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder and it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. V. Kanakammal Proprietrix, Lakshmi Saraswathi Bus Service Vs. Thi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-1972
Reported in: (1972)1MLJ344
..... authority to deal with matters like the one with which we are concerned the normal function of an appellate authority is to send back the matter to the original authority for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Muthalagu Vs. the Collector of Tiruchirapalli and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-1972
Reported in: (1972)2MLJ42
..... personal involvement of the manager in the delinquency should be separately given by the officers functioning under the madras entertainment tax act and that such a finding alone could be taken .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.L. Goswami Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-04-1972
Reported in: AIR1972SC716; 1972CriLJ511; (1972)3SCC22; [1972]2SCR948; 1972(4)LC476(SC)
..... him with the research project on effect of hypoxia and decompression on body temperature as function of adaptation to hypoxia at various altitude the terms and conditions of grant in aid .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial