Function - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: function Sorted by: old Year: 1967 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.027 seconds)Kaplan Vs. Lehman Brothers
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1967
..... rates of commission respondents contend that this provision sufficiently demonstrates the sec performs a supervisory function in respect of the exchange s rate fixing to exempt the practice from review under ..... court s opinion in silver the importance of the new york stock exchange in the functioning and livelihood of this nation cannot be gainsaid ever increasing millions of persons and billions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMora Vs. Mcnamara
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1967
..... indicate that what is happening is none of our business certainly it is not the function of the judiciary to entertain private litigation even by a citizen which challenges the legality .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBecker Vs. Philco Corporation.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1967
..... as opposed to myth the autonomy of the technostructure is to repeat yet again a functional necessity of the industrial system but the goals this autonomy serves allow some range of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHeller Vs. Connecticut.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1967
..... lawyer had petitioner s request to call him been granted might have performed an important function which was not capable of performance five or six hours later he might have insisted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Venkata Reddy and anr. Vs. Income-tax Officer (Central) I, Banglore ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-1967
Reported in: [1967]66ITR212(KAR); [1967]66ITR212(Karn)
..... it is stated that the section is wholly devoid of any guidance to the authorities functioning under the feature on the basis of which they could pick out persons for special ..... personal bias is alleged and is proved ordinarily in the case of high ranking officers functioning under statutes and discharging statutory duties bias is not be presumed because they are expected .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.N. Abdul Wahab and Co. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxe ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-1967
Reported in: AIR1968Kant100; AIR1968Mys100; (1967)1MysLJ284
..... section fall naturally under four heads 8 the first sub section confers on the authorities functioning under the act the normal power ancillary to the power of adjudication exercised by the ..... power may be described as the power to take evidence in aid of the main function of adjudication or formulation of an opinion to determine the tax liability of the person .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.S. Kuppuswami Vs. the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-1967
Reported in: (1967)2MLJ79
..... in the plaint it is stated that the petitioner failed and neglected to perform his functions and thus facilitated defendants 3 to 4 to indulge in the acts of misappropriation which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Venkata Reddy and anr. Vs. Income-tax Officer, (Central)-i and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-1967
..... it is stated that the section is wholly devoid of any guidance to the authorities functioning under the statute on the basis of which they could pick out persons for special ..... personal bias is alleged and is proved ordinarily in the case of high ranking officers functioning under statutes and discharging statutory duties bias is not to be presumed because they are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.P. Sharma Vs. Industrial Court and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-1967
Reported in: AIR1967MP177; [1967(15)FLR109]; (1968)ILLJ99MP
..... of a corporation and it held that if a department of a municipality discharges many functions some pertaining to industry as defined in the act and other non industrial activities the ..... predominant functions of the department shall be criterion for the purposes of the act amongst the departments .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyed Yousuf Yarkhan and ors. Vs. Syed Mohammed Yarkhan and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-04-1967
Reported in: AIR1967SC1318; [1967]2SCR318
..... officer air1963sc849 he submitted that the state government has delegated its function of superintendence over wakfs to the board of wakfs and ..... government is a statutory corporation and is vested with statutory powers functions and duties the board has power to hold property and ..... section 54 the board wakfs is not discharging a governmental function the act nowhere says that the board would act as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial