Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Ful - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 11 2026

Ful Kuwar Devi & Ors vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2026

& ORS ....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Ms. Anjali Singh, Advocates for Respondent Nos.1-5. (4) + MAC.APP. 336/2014 FUL KUWAR DEVI & ORS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Ms. Anjali Singh, Advocates.versusORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ....Respondent Through:


Apr 28 2017

Prem Ful Kumari Vs. Central Coalfields Limited Through Its Chairman Cu ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Apr-28-2017

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6016 of 2016 ­­­­­­ Prem Ful Kumari, Daughter of Late Narayan Bhagat, presently residing at Kedla­ 3 No., 64 No. Colony, P.O.­Kedla, P.S. Mandu,


Nov 27 2002

Mosomat Ful Sunder Ojha with Manoj Kumar Ojha Vs. State and anr.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Nov-27-2002

this stage, the State also submits that it will not oppose the prayer for bail.8. The petitioner Mosomat Ful Sunder Ojha in Cr. Misc. No. 9488 of 2002 and petitioner Manoj Kumar Ojha in Cr. Misc. No.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 16 2004

Ful Devi Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Jul-16-2004

the date of his superannuation from service. Mr. Singh submitted that the petitioner was entitled to her husband's full salary from the date of his disappearance till the date of his superannuation. Alternatively, he submitted that in


Mar 02 1996

Gajanansingh Ful Singh Rajput Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-02-1996

Reported in: 1996CriLJ2921; II(1996)DMC596

1. The accused Gajanansingh has challenged his conviction for an offence under Section 306 as also under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code by way of Criminal Appeal No. 160/94. 2. The prosecution story is...


Jun 20 1969

Ful Kumar and anr. Vs. the State

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Jun-20-1969

R.S. Bindra, J.1. The appellants Fulkumar and Lalikumar challenge the correctness of their conviction under Section 364, Indian Penal Code, and sentence of 8


Nov 10 1908

Ful Chand Vs. Nazab Ali Chowdhry

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-10-1908

Reported in: (1909)ILR36Cal184

Matched in: Parties Ful Chand Vs. Nazab Ali Chowdhry


Nov 10 1908

Ful Chand Bibee Vs. Nawab Ali Chowdhry and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-10-1908

Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.740

Matched in: Parties Ful Chand Bibee Vs. Nawab Ali Chowdhry and anr.


Mar 11 2026

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Ful Kuwar Devi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2026

& ORS ....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Ms. Anjali Singh, Advocates for Respondent Nos.1-5. (4) + MAC.APP. 336/2014 FUL KUWAR DEVI & ORS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Ms. Anjali Singh, Advocates.versusORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ....Respondent Through:


Jun 16 1955

Municipal Commissioners, Howrah Vs. Ful Chand Agarwalla

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-16-1955

Reported in: AIR1956Cal181,1956CriLJ612,59CWN1098

Matched in: Parties Municipal Commissioners, Howrah Vs. Ful Chand Agarwalla


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial