From The Bar - Judgment Search Results
State Bar Council of m.p. Vs.bar Council of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-06-2018
the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as "SBCMP") seeking inter alia a direction to the Bar Council of India (hereinafter referred to as “BCI”) as also the Chairman of the BCI to implement the … hereinbelow: - ― Part-B Serial No.1: Discussion, consideration and decision regarding the election of the representative member of the Bar Council for the Bar Council of India‖ 5. Pursuant to its aforementioned notice dated 09.06.2014, the... Petitioner held
Bar Council of Kerala vs Bar Council of India and Others
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-27-2023
V FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 4049 OF 2010 PETITIONER/S: BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA BHAVAN, HIGH COURT CAMPUS, ERNAKULAM,, KOCHI- 682013, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. SRI.GEORGE THOMAS MEVADA(SR.) SRI.MANU
Lakshmi Kanta Bar Vs. Rabindra Nath Bar and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-15-2010
Matched in: Parties Lakshmi Kanta Bar Vs. Rabindra Nath Bar and ors.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Niranjan Bar. Vs. Nirmal Bar and anr.
Court: Kolkata Appellate
Decided on: Apr-04-2011
fact that the defendant no.1 registered a deed of sale dated March 27, 1987 in favour of Matangini Bar and Sanat Kumar Bar over 93 decimals land including the land in suit. There was an agreement for
Bar Association Vs. Uttar Pradesh Bar Council
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-09-1999
Reported in: (1999)3UPLBEC2087
U.P. Bar Council. We are of the view that this circular has not yet been strictly enforced by the Bar Council and those fake Bar Associations or Lawyers who violated guidelines are not proceeded with by the Bar … the Bar Council and those fake Bar Associations or Lawyers who violated guidelines are not proceeded with by the Bar Council itself. The frequent closures of the Courts has caused immense damage it results into not only stoppage
Bar Council of Delhi Vs. Bar Council of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-1974
Reported in: AIR1975Delhi200; ILR1975Delhi321
the removal of its Chairman by passing a resolution of no confidence against him in a meeting of the Bar Council summoned for that purpose The question has arisen for decision as follows :-(2) After the Delhi Bar … the Chairman of the Delhi Bar Council. Later differences arose between him and some of the members of the Bar Council. A meeting of the Bar Council was called on September 22, 1972 in which a resolution of
Gobardhan Bar Vs. Gunadhar Bar
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-03-1940
Reported in: AIR1941Cal78
79 of the finally published Record of Rights of mouza Nilkanthea, which belonged jointly to Indra Mull and Barada Dei. One of the plots comprised in the said holding which is C. S. plot No. 1050 was
Bar Council of India and Another Vs. Aparna Basu Mallick and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-25-1994
Reported in: AIR1994SC1334; JT1994(1)SC141; 1994(1)SCALE194; (1994)2SCC102; 1994(1)LC257(SC); MANU/SC/0308/1994
conferred the law degree in tens of Regulation 35 by the Calcutta University. Soon thereafter she applied to the Bar Council of West Bengal, for enrolment as an Advocate and paid the fee of Rs. 250. However, she … an Advocate and paid the fee of Rs. 250. However, she was informed by the Assistant Secretary of the Bar Council that she was not entitled to be enrolled as she did not fulfil the condition of Rule
Bar Council of Delhi Vs. Shri Adish C. Aggarwala and Bar Council of In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2003
Reported in: 2003VIIAD(Delhi)597; AIR2004Delhi114; 107(2003)DLT355
India in place of Shri Adish C. Aggarwala with immediate effect. There is, however, also a letter purportedly from the Bar Council of India dated 27.8.2003 addressed to the Bar Council of Delhi to the effect that the process
Delhi Bar Association and Others Vs. Delhi High Court Bar Association ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
Court Bar Association (Defendant No.1), Mr Mohit Mathur, Honorary Secretary, Delhi High Court Bar Association (Defendant No.1A) and the Bar Council of Delhi (Defendant No.2). The suit was filed seeking, inter alia, the following prayers:“It is therefore most … by the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA). It was observed by the learned single Judge that as the bar associations were not members of the DHCBA, they were neither necessary nor proper parties. The learned single Judge
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free