Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

From The Bar - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 06 2018

State Bar Council of m.p. Vs.bar Council of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-06-2018

the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as "SBCMP") seeking inter alia a direction to the Bar Council of India (hereinafter referred to as “BCI”) as also the Chairman of the BCI to implement the … hereinbelow: - ― Part-B Serial No.1: Discussion, consideration and decision regarding the election of the representative member of the Bar Council for the Bar Council of India‖ 5. Pursuant to its aforementioned notice dated 09.06.2014, the... Petitioner held


Oct 27 2023

Bar Council of Kerala vs Bar Council of India and Others

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-27-2023

V FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 4049 OF 2010 PETITIONER/S: BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA BHAVAN, HIGH COURT CAMPUS, ERNAKULAM,, KOCHI- 682013, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. SRI.GEORGE THOMAS MEVADA(SR.) SRI.MANU


Jun 15 2010

Lakshmi Kanta Bar Vs. Rabindra Nath Bar and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-15-2010

Matched in: Parties Lakshmi Kanta Bar Vs. Rabindra Nath Bar and ors.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 04 2011

Niranjan Bar. Vs. Nirmal Bar and anr.

Court: Kolkata Appellate

Decided on: Apr-04-2011

fact that the defendant no.1 registered a deed of sale dated March 27, 1987 in favour of Matangini Bar and Sanat Kumar Bar over 93 decimals land including the land in suit. There was an agreement for


Aug 09 1999

Bar Association Vs. Uttar Pradesh Bar Council

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Aug-09-1999

Reported in: (1999)3UPLBEC2087

U.P. Bar Council. We are of the view that this circular has not yet been strictly enforced by the Bar Council and those fake Bar Associations or Lawyers who violated guidelines are not proceeded with by the Bar … the Bar Council and those fake Bar Associations or Lawyers who violated guidelines are not proceeded with by the Bar Council itself. The frequent closures of the Courts has caused immense damage it results into not only stoppage


Oct 16 1974

Bar Council of Delhi Vs. Bar Council of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-16-1974

Reported in: AIR1975Delhi200; ILR1975Delhi321

the removal of its Chairman by passing a resolution of no confidence against him in a meeting of the Bar Council summoned for that purpose The question has arisen for decision as follows :-(2) After the Delhi Bar … the Chairman of the Delhi Bar Council. Later differences arose between him and some of the members of the Bar Council. A meeting of the Bar Council was called on September 22, 1972 in which a resolution of


May 03 1940

Gobardhan Bar Vs. Gunadhar Bar

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-03-1940

Reported in: AIR1941Cal78

79 of the finally published Record of Rights of mouza Nilkanthea, which belonged jointly to Indra Mull and Barada Dei. One of the plots comprised in the said holding which is C. S. plot No. 1050 was


Jan 25 1994

Bar Council of India and Another Vs. Aparna Basu Mallick and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-25-1994

Reported in: AIR1994SC1334; JT1994(1)SC141; 1994(1)SCALE194; (1994)2SCC102; 1994(1)LC257(SC); MANU/SC/0308/1994

conferred the law degree in tens of Regulation 35 by the Calcutta University. Soon thereafter she applied to the Bar Council of West Bengal, for enrolment as an Advocate and paid the fee of Rs. 250. However, she … an Advocate and paid the fee of Rs. 250. However, she was informed by the Assistant Secretary of the Bar Council that she was not entitled to be enrolled as she did not fulfil the condition of Rule


Sep 25 2003

Bar Council of Delhi Vs. Shri Adish C. Aggarwala and Bar Council of In ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-25-2003

Reported in: 2003VIIAD(Delhi)597; AIR2004Delhi114; 107(2003)DLT355

India in place of Shri Adish C. Aggarwala with immediate effect. There is, however, also a letter purportedly from the Bar Council of India dated 27.8.2003 addressed to the Bar Council of Delhi to the effect that the process


Dec 03 2013

Delhi Bar Association and Others Vs. Delhi High Court Bar Association ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-03-2013

Court Bar Association (Defendant No.1), Mr Mohit Mathur, Honorary Secretary, Delhi High Court Bar Association (Defendant No.1A) and the Bar Council of Delhi (Defendant No.2). The suit was filed seeking, inter alia, the following prayers:“It is therefore most … by the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA). It was observed by the learned single Judge that as the bar associations were not members of the DHCBA, they were neither necessary nor proper parties. The learned single Judge


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial