Free - Judgment Search Results
Free Vs. Bland
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-21-1962
Free v. Bland - 369 U.S. 663 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Free v. Bland, 369 U.S. 663 (1962) Free
In Re: Indian Companies Act Vii of 1913; in Re: Free Press Journal (Ma ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-1956
Reported in: (1956)2MLJ463
ORDERBalakrishna Ayyar, J.1. On 19th April, 1955, an application was made to wind up the Free Press Journal (Madras) Ltd. On 2nd May, 1955, an interim receiver was appointed and on 18th July, 1955,
Free India Dry Accumulators Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-01-1996
Reported in: 1999(107)ELT290(SC); JT1998(9)SC238; (1998)8SCC416
Single Judge upheld the appellants' contention, taking the view that since the containers were obtained from the Railways free of charge, it could not be said that any cost was incurred by the appellants in that behalf
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Free Legal Aid Committee, Jamshedpur Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-10-1981
Reported in: AIR1982SC1463; 1982CriLJ1943; (1982)3SCC378
Matched in: Parties Free Legal Aid Committee, Jamshedpur Vs. State of Bihar
M/s. Free India Plastic Corporation Vs Anas Nazir
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-10-2026
MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI IN CRP SR NO. 21236 OF 2026, & IN CRP SR NO. 21237 OF 20261. M/s. Free India Plastic Corporation Rep. by its Managing Partner Kunhi Mohammed, S/o. Pocker Haji, Having Office at Opp. to
Hyderabad Duty Free Retail Limited Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
+ LPA No.147/2015, CMs No.4767/2015 (for stay), 4768/2015 (for exemption) & 4769/2015 (for filing additional documents). HYDERABAD DUTY FREE RETAIL LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Abhishek Sharma and Mr. Yash Srivastava, Advs. Versus UNION
Flemingo Duty-free Shop Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Vivek S. Bhatt Vs. Union of ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-05-2008
Reported in: 2008(4)ALLMR663; (2008)110BOMLR1730
Mumbai. According to the Petitioner No. 1, it is engaged in the business of operating and running duty Free Retail Outlets in International Airports in India. The Respondent No. 1 is the union of India and the
Free Legal Aid Cell (Ngo) Vs. Govt. of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-03-2005
Reported in: AIR2005Bom271; 2005(6)BomCR429
in the larger public interest by a firm of legal-minded retired persons, who have been involved in giving free legal aid and advice to the most tortured and affected persons in the society, so that fatal and
Transport Nagar Free Zone Co-operative Society Limited Vs. Nagpur Impr ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-07-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALLMR643; 2005(3)BomCR485
the resolution, 45 plots were allotted to Dal Miller Association and 139 plots were allotted to the Octroi Free Zone Cooperative Housing Society.9. The learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1 states that at the relevant time
Flemingo Duty Free Shops Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the P ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-22-2009
Reported in: ILR2009KAR3462; 2009(5)KarLJ480
ORDERAnand Byrareddy, J.1. Heard the Counsel for the petitioner and the Advocate General on behalf of the respondents.2. The factual background is as follows:The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. It is...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free