Fraud - Judgment Search Results

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Rahul Modi

Court: Supreme Court of India

CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 538-539 .OF2019(@ SLP(Crl)Nos.94-95 OF2019 Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Rahul Modi and Another Etc. 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Nittin Johari

Court: Supreme Court of India

NON­REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1381 OF2019(@ S.L.P. (CRL.) No.7437 OF2019Serious Fraud Investigation Office …Appellant(s) Versus Nittin Johari & Anr. …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.Leave granted.2. The instant appeal

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Rahul Modi

Court: Supreme Court of India

JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal Nos.185-186 of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos. 5180-5181 of 2019) Serious Fraud Investigation Office .... Appellant(s) Versus Rahul Modi & Ors. …. Respondent (s) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave granted.1.

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Sahara Housing Investment Corpo ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 4299 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 531 of 2022) Serious Fraud Investigation Office Appellants and Others Versus Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Respondents Limited and Others W I T H

Serious Fraud Investigation Office versus Aditya Sarda

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025]5S.C.R.485

[2025] 5 S.C.R. 485 : 2025 INSC 477 Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Aditya Sarda (Criminal Appeal No. 1872 of 2025) 09 April 2025 [Bela M. Trivedi* and

Serious Fraud Investigation Office versus Aditya Sarda

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025] 5 S.C.R. 485

[2025] 5 S.C.R. 485 : 2025 INSC 477Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Aditya Sarda (Criminal Appeal No. 1872 of 2025) 09 April 2025 [Bela M. Trivedi* and

Result of Fraud or Negligence of the Employees Primarily Vs. State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

employees to create a definite realisation in them to be responsible and not to act negligently or play fraud on the government. The consequences thereof are clearly stated in the said rule.15. The above provisions cannot be

Vikas Agarwal vs.serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court: Delhi

Sethi, Sandeep Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajit Sharma, Mr. Adnan Siddiqui and Mr. Ashutosh Senger, Advocates Versus SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Randeep Sachdeva and Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Advocates

Nittin Johari vs.serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court: Delhi

Advocate with Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr. Gautam Khazanchi, Mr. Akshilesh Kumar & Mr. Pradyuman Kaistha, Advocates. Versus SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Ajay Digpal, CGSC & Mr. Sameer S.

Kamla Luthra vs.serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court: Delhi

Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Mr. Pravesh Khyalia, Mr.Siddhartha Jain, Mr. Aditya Singh and Mr. Akshay Arya, Advocates. versus SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI Through Mr. Rahul Arora, Sr. Prosecutor for state.