Franchise Tax - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: franchise tax Page 1 of about 9 results (0.018 seconds)Franchise Tax Board of California Vs. United Americans
Court: US Supreme Court
UNITED AMERICANS - 419 U.S. 890 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA v. UNITED AMERICANS , 419 U.S. AMERICANS - 419 U.S. 890 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA v. UNITED AMERICANS , 419 U.S. 890
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFranchise Tax Board Vs. Usps
Court: US Supreme Court
, 111 U. S. 710 (1884). See also Randall v. Franchise Tax Board, 453 F.2d 381 (CA9 1971); Greene v. Franchise United States had made regarding the withholding of state income taxes from the pay of federal employees, applies only to withholding
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFranchise Tax Bd. Vs. Construction Laborers
Court: US Supreme Court
the Central District of California, and the court denied the Franchise Tax Board's motion for remand to the state court. On not "arise" under ERISA. The State's right to enforce its tax levies is not of central concern to the federal statute.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFranchise Tax Bd. Vs. Alcan
Court: US Supreme Court
business in California -- brought separate suits against petitioner California Franchise Tax Board (Board) and certain of its employees, seeking declaratory Id. at 697. The Seventh Circuit stated that the unitary tax diminishes the attractiveness of owning American subsidiaries in comparison with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFranchise Tax Bd. of Cal. Vs. Hyatt
Court: US Supreme Court
income tax laws is an essential attribute of sovereignty. See Franchise Tax Bd. of Gal. v. Postal Service, 467 U. S. Gilbert P. Hyatt (hereinafter respondent) filed a "part-year" resident income tax return in California for 1991. App. to Pet. for Cert.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBarclays Bank Plc Vs. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal.
Court: US Supreme Court
United States as Amicus Curiae in Barclays Bank PLC V. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal., O. T. 1992, No. 92-212, cert. in the California combined reporting group, "the breadth of double taxation and the degree of burden on foreign commerce are greater
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTContainer Corp. Vs. Franchise Tax Bd.
Court: US Supreme Court
Cal.2d 417, 386 P.2d 40 (1963); Superior Oil Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 60 Cal.2d 406, 386 P.2d 33 (1963). [ still taxed twice, although the credit insures that the total tax is no greater than that which would be paid under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMcculloch Vs. California Franchise Tax Board
Court: US Supreme Court
379 U.S. 133 (1964) 379 U.S. 133 McCULLOCH v. CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. U.S. 133 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court McCULLOCH v. CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, 379 U.S. 133 (1964) 379 U.S. 133 McCULLOCH v.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHunt-wesson, Inc. Vs. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal.
Court: US Supreme Court
App. 54; see also Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 7 Cal. 3d 544, 498 P. 2d 1030 seeks to relate the deduction limit to collection of California's tax on unitary income. If California could show that its deduction
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>