Fourteenth - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: fourteenth Page 1 of about 302 results (0.042 seconds)Chandravadan M. Gandhi Vs. Fourteenth Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Reported in: (1990)32ITD274(Mum.)
1 this appeal by the assessee is directed against refusal of relief under section 80u which is available by way...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFourteenth Income-tax Officer Vs. Manoharlal J. Kalro (Huf).
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: [1986]17ITD387(Mum)
order1 they two appeals filed by the department relate to the same assessee they raise a common issue for decision...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMcdonald Vs. Chicago
Court: US Supreme Court
..... declared to belong to the citizen by the constitution itself even opponents of fourteenth amendment enforcement legislation acknowledged that the privileges or immunities clause protected constitutionally ..... statute criminalizing narcotics addiction as cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the fourteenth amendment based on nature of the alleged crime without historical analysis brief .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOregon Vs. Mitchell
Court: US Supreme Court
..... page 400 u s 195 amendment or enfranchising legislation was unnecessary because the fourteenth amendment prohibited racial discrimination in voter qualifications each had earlier expressed the opposite ..... only to certain explicit limitations such as for example those imposed by the fourteenth fifteenth nineteenth and twenty fourth amendments admitting that unreasonable residence requirements may not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaxwell Vs. Dow
Court: US Supreme Court
..... territory or jurisdiction although this case was principally discussed under that clause of the fourteenth amendment which prohibits a state from denying to any person within its jurisdiction the ..... in respect of the privileges and immunities specified therein since the adoption of the fourteenth amendment those privileges and immunities are in my opinion also guarded against infringement by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdamson Vs. California
Court: US Supreme Court
..... to invalidate states legislative regulation of property rights or business practices under the fourteenth amendment unless there were racial discrimination involved in the state law challenged the ..... immunities which he considered protected by national power from state interference by the fourteenth amendment apparently dissatisfied with the limited interpretation of mr justice field mr justice .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMonroe Vs. Pape
Court: US Supreme Court
..... unnecessary whenever there were self executing provisions of state constitutions also forbidding what the fourteenth amendment forbids the only alternative is page 365 u s 199 to disregard ..... state and local concern except insofar as absolutely necessary for effective assurance of the fourteenth amendment s guarantees therefore the line of distinction between state authorized and unauthorized actions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTennessee Vs. Lane
Court: US Supreme Court
..... enforcement legislation is not limited to mere legislative repetition of this court s fourteenth amendment jurisprudence garrett supra at 365 congress may remedy and deter state violations ..... met certain educational criteria though those tests were not themselves in violation of the fourteenth amendment we held that 5 authorizes prophylactic legislation that is legislation that proscribes .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke
Court: US Supreme Court
..... past societal discrimination to the extent that such action is consistent with the fourteenth amendment the legislative history of title vi administrative regulations interpreting the statute subsequent ..... that the entity using explicit racial classifications itself had violated 1 of the fourteenth amendment or an antidiscrimination regulation for again race conscious remedies have been approved .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMalloy Vs. Hogan
Court: US Supreme Court
..... this court now holds the contempt adjudication unconstitutional because it is decided 1 the fourteenth amendment makes the fifth amendment privilege against self incrimination applicable to the states 2 ..... automatic engrafting of federal law construing constitutional provisions inapplicable to the states onto the fourteenth amendment the decision in mapp v ohio 367 u s 643 that evidence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial