Four Way Stop - Judgment Search Results

Shoppers Stop Ltd vs.softobell Inc. & Ors

Court: Delhi

in such cases by directing the plaintiffs to lead ex parte evidence in the form of affidavit by way of examination-in-chief and which invariably is a repetition of the contents of the plaint. The plaint otherwise, as … 1 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 204/2016 SHOPPERS STOP LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sagar Chandra, Advocate with Ms. Surabhi Iyer and Ms. Shubhie Wahi, Advocates. versus

Limited Stop and Fastpassenger Association Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

K.RAMAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2013 10TH ASHADHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 15771 of 2013 (V) PETITIONER(S):1. LIMITED STOP AND FASTPASSENGER ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, AJITH LUKOSE S/O.P.A.LUKOSE, PUTHENKAKAYIL, KANAKARY POST KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.2. T.A.BABU THOTTICHILA, KUMARAKOM

One Stop Airline Mro Support Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

Reported in: (2008)(126)ECC216

as lubricants, oils and greases can not be characterized as raw material Can not be brought within the four corners of the exemption Advance Ruling Exemption Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. dated 01.03.2002 and Notification No. 6/2006-CE dated 1.3.2006 … occur. The words used in the provision, imposing taxes or granting exemption should be understood in the same way in which these are understood in ordinary parlance in the area in which the law is in force … Appellants: One Stop Airline MRO Support Private Limited Vs.For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: S. Ganesh, Sr. Counsel, For

Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. Vs. Florida Dept. of Environmental ...

Court: US Supreme Court

state actions that achieve the same thing. Thus, when the government uses its own property in such a way that it destroys private property, it has taken that property. See United States v. Causby , 328 U. … Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection - 08-1151 … the Florida Supreme Court’s decision effected a taking of the Members’ littoral rights contrary to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments; rehearing was denied. Held: The judgment is affirmed. 998 So. 2d 1102, affirmed. Justice Scalia delivered the

Douglas Oil Co. Vs. Petrol Stops Northwest

Court: US Supreme Court

The Government's investigation culminated on March 19, 1975, when the grand jury returned an indictment charging petitioners and four other oil companies with having conspired to fix the price of "rebrand gasoline" in California, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, … the future to rule upon disclosure motions could weigh these concerns against the need for disclosure. In this way, the court provided precisely what was required by the situation: a coordinating of the informed views of both … Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest - 441 U.S. 211 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Douglas Oil Co.

Karnataka State Private College Stop-gap Lecturers Association Vs. Sta ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1992SC677; JT1992(1)SC373; 1992LabIC575; (1993)IILLJ831SC; 1992(1)SCALE198; (1992)2SCC29; [1992]1SCR397; 1992(1)SLJ215(SC); 1992(1)LC521(SC); (1992)2UPLBEC1110

in a year and that too for number of years is yet another grievance.2. Ad-hoc appointments, a convenient way of entry usually from backdoor, at times even in disregard of rules and regulations, are comparatively recent innovation … Or the rules or circulars issued by the department itself empower the authority to do so as a stop-gap arrangement. The former is an abuse of power. It is unpardonable. Even- if it is found to have