Four Seas - Judgment Search Results

insurance Company Vs. Sea

Court: US Supreme Court

error that the court erred in ruling Page 88 U. S. 160 upon each and all of the four points made upon the trial, as stated above. THE CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the Court. Much

Goa Sea Foods Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1991)98CTR(Ker)1; [1991]189ITR431(Ker)

K. S. Paripoornan, J. 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following questions of law arising out of its common appellate order dated March 6, 1986, and rendered in I. T. A. No. 758(Coch) of...

Sea Pearl Industries and ors. Etc Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Coch ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC590; 2001(73)ECC429; 2001(127)ELT649(SC); JT2001(1)SC394; 2001(1)SCALE88; [2001]1SCR184

RUMA PAL, J.The question to be decided in this appeal is whether the appellant was an exporter for the purposes of Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant processes sea foods. It exported...

Hotel Sea Gull Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1506; (SCSuppl)2002(3)CHN89; JT2002(3)SC195; 2002(3)SCALE29; (2002)4SCC1; [2002]2SCR576

Bhan, J.1. The appellant (writ petitioner before the High Court) being aggrieved by the Division Bench judgment of the High Court of Calcutta where under the Division Bench overturning the decision of the Single Judge has...

Sea Lark Fisheries Vs. United India Insurance Co. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(1)AWC772(SC); JT2008(2)SC139; 2008(2)SCALE137; (2008)4SCC131; 2008(1)LC247(SC); 2008AIRSCW2048; [2008] 2 SCR 346

what purpose such a survey was conducted is not known. Why a report was submitted after more than four months from the date of conducting the survey is also beyond our comprehension.11. A marine insurance policy requires

Sea Pearl Industries and ors. Etc. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2001)165CTR(SC)395

Ruma Pal, J.The question to be decided in this appeal is whether the appellant was an exporter for the purposes of section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. The appellant processes sea foods. It exported...

Southern Sea Foods Ltd. Vs. Jt. Cit

Court: Supreme Court of India

ORDERSpecial Leave Petn. (Civil) No. 18408 of 2007:1. List after four weeks.Special Leave Petn. (Civil) No. 17150 of 2008:2. In this special leave petition, the revenue has raised the

Sheshank Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd., Karnataka Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996(88)ELT626(SC); 1996(8)SCALE461; (1996)11SCC755; [1996]Supp8SCR802

S.B. Bharucha, J. 1. The principal judgment was delivered by a Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in the case of M/s. Kamath Packaging Limited (Civil Appeal No. 1153/92). In the other matters the...

M/s. Sea Eagle Dredging Marine Infrastructure Private Limited Vs. Reli ...

Court: Mumbai

Oral Judgment: 1. By this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the said Act ), the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award dated 26th December, 2014 directing the...

M/s. Sea Coral Clearing and Forwarding, Chennai Vs. The Commissioner o ...

Court: Chennai

20 of the Regulation as stated in the impugned order and conclude the proceedings within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition