Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Four Party - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 01 2014

Parties. Vs. Mrs. Anirudh Tiwari and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-01-2014

Kanchan 2014.08.06 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh C.O.C.P.No.1981 of 2014 2 parties. In the affidavit dated 8.11.2004, it is stated that the judgment Annexure P-5 would be complied with within


Mar 06 1967

B. Party No. 2: Alingal Mohamed Kutty Vs. A. Party: Vaniyanthodi Pathu ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-06-1967

Reported in: AIR1968Ker70; 1968CriLJ351

itself it could clearly be seen that there is likelihood of a breach of peace ensuing if the parties are allowed to have their own way. The learned Magistrate was satisfied on the police report that to


Feb 03 1998

Dr. Subramanian Swamy, President, All India Janatha Party, No. 1, Papa ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-03-1998

Reported in: 1998(1)CTC300

ORDER1. The petitioner herein has filed this petition against the order of the learned Sessions Judge directing the issuance of process inter alia contending that it is the Magistrate who is alone vested with the power...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 21 1965

Ratnakar Naik and ors. (Second Party Nos. 1 to 3) Vs. Golakh Chandra S ...

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Jan-21-1965

Reported in: AIR1966Ori56; 1966CriLJ279

ORDERG.K. Misra, J.1. Second party Nos. 1 to 3 arc the petitioners. The proceeding is one under Section 147, Cr. P.C. It is


Feb 06 1953

Turu Majhi and ors., (2nd Party) Vs. the State (Bimal Mukherjee, 1st P ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-06-1953

Reported in: AIR1953Cal397,57CWN311

proceedings were started, that the petitioners Turu Majni and others, who are Sonthals and men of the second party, obtained settlement of the lands in 1927, but after cultivating the lands for some years, they abandoned the


Sep 23 2022

Owners And Parties Interested In The Vessel M.v. Polaris Galaxy Vs. Ba ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-23-2022

11 June 2020, by GP on Aramco for the amount of USD6705,357.38 (approx INR4907,04,087.89 (Forty-Nine Crore, Seven Lakh, Four Thousand and Eighty Seven only) (CALCULATED AT1USD=73 INR). The Plaintiff learnt about this subsequently when in the course … of marine fuel. In terms of the Bill of Lading the consignee was the Respondent Bank, the ‘Notify Party’ was Gulf 3 Petrochem FZC and the Port of Discharge was Singapore. On the said date Gulf Petroleum


Mar 11 2024

Communist Party Of India Marxist Vs. Dinesh Kumar Khara

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-11-2024

are within the validity period of fifteen days but that which have not been encashed by the political party yet shall be returned by the political party or the purchaser depending on who is in possession of


Sep 16 2005

Shiv Sena Party Vs. B.C. Deshmukh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-16-2005

of customary Law - Whether the customary practice prevalent in a community can prevail over the Statutory provisions, particularly a customary practice of Aliyasanthana can prevail over the provisions of Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act


Jan 21 2014

Janatha Dal Party Vs. the Indian National Congress and ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-21-2014

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.38991 OF2013Janatha Dal Party … Petitioner Versus The Indian National Congress & Others … Respondents JUDGMENT K. S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. We are,


Oct 14 2014

Indian Democratic Party and anr Vs. U.O.i. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-14-2014

relief is ordered accordingly.” In SLP(C) No.7277/14, IA No.2-3/2014 were filed. In the said applications, on 09.05.2014, a four-Judge bench, passed the following order:“The order dated 17.4.2014 passed by this Court is clarified and it is directed … filed similar applications. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we direct to implead the applicants as party to C.A. No.9048/2012, extend the cut-off for counselling and admission as fixed by the final judgment and order


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial