Former Adjudication - Judgment Search Results
Adjudicating Officer Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Bhaves ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-28-2019
SEBI Act. Sections 15A to 15HA are the penalty provisions whereas Section 15I deals with the power of adjudication and Section 15J enumerates the “factors to be taken into account by the Adjudicating Officer” while adjudging the
Dkg Buildcon Private Limited Vs. The Adjudicating And Enquiry Officer, ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-14-2022
on 01.04.2003 requiring appellant’s attendance on 08.04.2003. It was mentioned that in default of appearance, SEBI will initiate adjudication proceedings against the appellant, under which the appellant could be levied a penalty of One Lakh rupees for
N Narayanan Vs. Adjudicating Officer, Sebi
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
a period of two years from buying, selling or dealing in securities and the order passed by the adjudication officer dated July 28, 2011 imposing a monetary penalty of 50 lacs under Section 15HA of SEBI Act.3.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lally Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner (Adjudication), Central Ex ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2018
was sought to be denied on proportionate basis. Proceedings were initiated which resulted in the impugned order.3. The adjudicating authority held as below:"26. The rules clearly provides that the exempted services includes services on which no service
Sri. Neelkantha Rathod Vs. The Adjudicating Authority
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-11-2020
PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED DATED:22.07.2016 PASSED THE HON’BLE CHAIRPERSON, ADJUDICATION AUTHORITY UNDER THE17PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT, 2002 IN O.C. NO.556/2016 (ANNEXURE-C) IN W.P. NO.4215/2017: BETWEEN: DEVAS MULTIMEDIA
M/S Ramada Engineering Industry vs Additional Commissioner-Adjudicatio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 22nd April, 2026 Pronounced on: 23rd April, 2026+ W.P.(C) 1036/2026 & CM APPL. 5022/2026M/S RAMADA ENGINEERING INDUSTRY THROUGH ITS PARTNER SH. VIRENDER KUMAR GUPTA...
Progressive Alloys (India) Private Limited vs Joint Commissioner Adjud ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5814/2026 & CM APPL. 28621/2026, CM APPL. JBN IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Senior Standing Counsel for CGST with Mr Parikshit
Brilliant Metals Private Limited vs Joint Commissioner Adjudication Cg ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5814/2026 & CM APPL. 28621/2026, CM APPL. JBN IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Senior Standing Counsel for CGST with Mr Parikshit
Jbn Impex Private Limited vs Additional Commissioner Adjudication Cgst ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5814/2026 & CM APPL. 28621/2026, CM APPL. JBN IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CGST DELHI NORTH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Senior Standing Counsel for CGST with Mr Parikshit
M J Gold vs Deputy Commissioner (Adjudication)
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-30-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 10TH MAGHA, 1945 PETITIONER/S: M J GOLD AGED 54 YEARS M J GOLD,...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free