Forest Officer - Judgment Search Results

Divisional Forest Officer, Gadchiroli Vs. Madhukar Ramaji Undirwade an ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1995(4)BomCR468; 1996(2)MhLj376

the educational, physical and running tests for the pot of Forest Guard, though employer's sole witness has admitted that those who into force of the said Government Resolution. 16. In Chief Officer, Sangli Municipal Council's case (supra), this Court held as under

The Divisional Forest Officer, Nandyal Division and anr. Vs. Co-op. La ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1991(2)ALT553

with the procedure laid down in Section 44 of the Forest Act, the same shall be returned to the persons concerned is unwarranted. It is further directed that the Divisional Forest Officers shall strictly comply with the orders of the Chief Conservator

The Divisional Forest Officer Vs. the Forest Settelement Officer and o ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(6)ALD541

claims. On the above grounds, the Revision petition of the Forest Department is allowed....(emphasis supplied)6. It is thus evident that the and had confirmed the order of the previous Forest Settlement Officer. According to the Learned Government Pleader the letter dated 03.09.1985

Divisional Forest Officer (Authorised Officer) and ors. Vs. Laxman Pra ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1991(1)ALT304

the forest offences, the Divisional Forest Officer or the Sub-Divisional Forest Officer;(ii) all the forest offences where the value of the to 'any person aggrieved by an order passed by an officer under Rule 8,' before the Sub-Divisional Forest Officer, or the

Divisional Forest Officer, Social Forestry Project Vs. Presiding Offic ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1997)IILLJ1183P& H; (1997)116PLR537

department of the State exercises sovereign functions and, therefore, the Forest Department is outside the definition of word 'industry' to make benefits. In regard to objection taken by the Divisional Forest Officer that the Forest Department is a department of Haryana State

Divisional Forest Officer and anr. Vs. G.V. Sudhakar Rao and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC328; 1986CriLJ357; 1986(1)Crimes313(SC); 1985(2)SCALE897; (1985)4SCC573; [1985]3SCR680; [1985]Supp3SCR680

interest to suppress the mischief of ruthless exploitation of Government forests by illicit felling and removal of teak and other valuable produce is seized by the Authorized Officer or the Forest Officer or where any such timber or forest produce is produced

Divisional Forest Officer, Kalpetta and anr. Vs. C.C. Aravindan

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2000Ker121

cherry in question has been raised from a notified vested forest, the decision does not apply to the instant case.8. Per per confirmation order dated 1-11-1996 issued by the Divisional Forest Officer. According to the respondent the recovery of the said sum

Divisional Forest Officer Malayattoor and Others Vs. P.M. Jalal and An ...

Court: Kerala

as an offence under 1995 Rules and thereby under the Forest Act also. This legal position has not been taken note 1. This revision at the instance of the Divisional Forest Officer and the forest officials of the Kerala Government, filed under

The Divisional Forest Officer, Munnar . Vs. P.j. Antony, Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

that a presumption would arise under Section 69 of the Forest Act, whereby commission of a forest offence could be inferred, 25.03.2001 to the Divisional Forest Officer, Devikulam, through the Range Officer, Marayoor Forest. Therein, they stated the details of the sandalwood

Divisional Forest Officer, Jannaram, Adilabad Dist. Vs. Ailal Sathaiah ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(6)ALD1

Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Forests. In this case, Ihe petitioner's lorry bearing No.APQ 7568 was as under:On 23-3-1996 at about 4.15 a.m the Forest Range Officer, Birsaipet intercepted lorry bearing No. APQ 7568 and on inspecting