Forest Officer - Judgment Search Results

The Divisional Forest Officer, Munnar . Vs. P.j. Antony, Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Non-reportable 2024 INSC412IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICITON CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9751-9752 OF2011The Divisional Forest Officer, Munnar, Kerala, and another ….. Appellants Versus P.J.Antony, etc. ….. Respondents JUDGMENT SANJAY KUMAR, J1 These appeals arise … dated 1 03.04.1973. Aggrieved by this judgment and the directions therein, the State of Kerala and its Divisional Forest Officer, Munnar, filed these appeals.2. P.J.Antony and Cheriyan Kuruvila, the respondents in the present appeals, were the petitioners in

Divisional Forest Officer, Ranni, Kerala Vs. Collector of C. Ex. and C ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2004(164)ELT136(SC)

Matched in: Parties Divisional Forest Officer, Ranni, Kerala Vs. Collector of C. Ex. and Cus.

Divl. Forest Officer, Kothagudem and ors. Vs. Madhusudhan Rao

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(3)ALD125(SC); 2008(2)ALLMR(SC)786; 2008(3)ALT39(SC); [2008(117)FLR578]; JT2008(2)SC253; (2008)IILLJ671SC; (2008)2MLJ1018(SC); 2008(2)SCALE322; (2008)3SCC469; 2008(3)SL; 2008AIRSCW1365; 2008LABIC1308; 2008-II-LLJ-671; 2008(2)LH(SC)985

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted. Delay condoned.2. This appeal at the instance of the Divisional Forest Officer, Kothagudem and other officers of the Ministry of Forests, Government of Andhra Pradesh is directed against the judgment … by not issuing CF.140 receipt to the accused.Having been found guilty of both the charges by the Divisional Forest Officer, the following punishment was imposed upon the respondent, namely, (i) (5) Annual Grade Increments was stopped with cumulative

Divisional Forests Officers and ors. Vs. M. Ramalinga Reddy

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC2226; JT2007(5)SC353; 2007(5)SCALE494; (2007)9SCC286; 2007(1)LC0551(SC); 2007AIRSCW3896

terms of an order dated 24.12.1992 opining that it had no jurisdiction in that behalf. The District Employment Officer, Nellore sent a report to Appellant No. 1 holding the respondent guilty of misconduct. He thereafter filed an … S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Five vacancies of Foresters were notified on or about 22.11.1978 to the District Employment Exchange, Nellore. Pursuant thereto names were sponsored and

The Range Forest Officer Vs. S.T. Hadimani

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1147; 2002(2)AWC1268(SC); [2002(93)FLR179]; JT2002(2)SC238; 2002LabIC987; (2002)ILLJ1053SC; (2002)2MLJ137(SC); RLW2002(2)SC319; 2002(2)SCALE242; (2002)3SCC25; [200; MANU/SC/0115/2002

Matched in: Parties The Range Forest Officer Vs. S.T. Hadimani

Divisional Forest Officer and ors. Vs. Tata Finaly Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC2672; JT2001(5)SC332; 2001(2)KLT833(SC); 2001(4)SCALE270; (2001)5SCC684; [2001]3SCR821

Sayed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. The State of Kerala and the Divisional Forest Officers of two divisions are in appeal, by special leave, against he judgement and order of the High … Sayed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. The State of Kerala and the Divisional Forest Officers of two divisions are in appeal, by special leave, against he judgement and order of the High Court

Divisional Forest Officer and ors. Vs. S. Nageswaramma

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996VIIAD(SC)667; 1996(7)SCALE150; (1996)6SCC442; [1996]Supp5SCR196

Matched in: Parties Divisional Forest Officer and ors. Vs. S. Nageswaramma

Divisional Forest Officer Vs. Presiding Officer and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(9)SC125; (1998)9SCC275

5039 of 1988 dismissing the writ petition of the appellant in limine.3. The appellant herein is the Divisional Forest Officer, Timber Extension Division, Kullu, Himachal Pradesh, in charge of the Sales Depot at Nangal which is within the

District Forest Officer Vs. R. Rajamanickam and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2001)ILLJ1155SC; (2000)9SCC284

ORDERV.N. Khare, J.1. The respondents herein are the Forest Watchers and Guards in the employment of the Forest Department of the State of Tamil Nadu. It appears … the appellant by examining the witnesses in support of the charges and also witnesses examined by the delinquent officer in their defence. Before any final order could be passed, the respondents approached the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal,

Divisional Forest Officer Vs. Bishwanath Tea Co. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1368; 1981(1)SCALE771; (1981)3SCC238; [1981]3SCR662; 1981(13)LC470(SC)

Tea Co. Ltd., in the Assam and Nagaland High Court questioning the action of the appellant, the Divisional Forest Officer, Darrang Division, of recovering Rs. 7069.37 p. as royalty for cutting and felling trees from Tezalpatty grant No.