Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Judgment Search Results
Dr Partap Singh and anr. Vs. Director of Enforcement, Foreign Exchange ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-26-1985
Reported in: AIR1985SC989; [1985]58CompCas477(SC); 1986CriLJ824; (1985)46CTR(SC)319; 1985(6)ECC103; [1985]155ITR166(SC); 1985(1)SCALE1208; (1985)3SCC72; [1985]3SCR969
any documents which in his opinion will be useful for, or relevant to, in investigation or proceedings under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (Act for short) are secreted in any place, whereupon alone he may authorise any officer of Enforcement … is no substance in the allegation.7. Respondent No. 2 is a responsible officer being the Assistant Director, Enforcement, Foreign Exchange Regulation Act stationed at Jullundur. He issued the impugned search warrant which led to the seizure. In the affidavit in
Auto PIn India (Regd.) and anr. Vs. Director of Enforcement of Foreign ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2001
Reported in: 2001(59)DRJ57
go to the appellant. The fine deposited will be refunded to the appellant.Crl. A. 211/1982 stands disposed of. Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Section 2(p)--Person resident in India--Extension to 1947 Act--Definition of 'person resident in India' given in 1973
Dukhi Shyam Benupani, Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate, For ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-13-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)ALD(Cri)900,1998(61)ECC17
the application of the opposite party for bail in a case allegedly falling under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 on the accusation of contravention of the provision of Sections 8(1), 9(1)(b), 9(1)(d), 16(1)(a)(b), 18(2) and 18(3) … of the Code of Criminal Procedure to consider bail when officenes alleged to have been committed under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 and/or such matters which fall under Rule 9 of the Rules of the High Court?2) Whether the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kartar Singh Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, Foreign Exchange Regulati ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-23-1984
Reported in: 1984(2)ECC223; 1984(17)ELT229(P& H)
V.P. Gupta, J.1. This appeal has been filed by Kartar Singh under Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter called the Act), against the order of the Appellate Board dated May 2, 1983, whereby the … can be taken into consideration, while fixing quantum of penalty--Appellate board--Authorisation by chairman of powers to members of board--Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (46 of 1973), Sections 8(1), 50, 52(6), 54, 71(3), 72. - Sections 80 (2) & 89 & Punjab
Central Govt. Represented by the Director, Enforcement Directorate, Fo ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-18-1986
Reported in: AIR1987Ker179; 1987(13)ECC248; 1987(31)ELT902(Ker)
respondent in this appeal for the alleged violation of the provisions of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The main contention of the respondent before the Board was that rules of natural justice were breached … 40--Has right to cross-examine witness--Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal Rules, 1974, Rule 3--Customs Act (52 of 1962), Sections 107, 108--Foreign exchange regulation Act (46 of 1973), Sections 8(1), 9(1)(f)(i), 39, 40, 50, 51. - - He says that it is unnecessary
V. Savarimuthu Vs. Special Director of Enforcement, Foreign Exchange R ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-22-1985
Reported in: (1986)1MLJ206
have resorted to a regular appeal before the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board under Section 52 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (46 of 1972), hereinafter referred to as the 'Act', He has not done so. On the ground that
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free