Foreign Exchange - Judgment Search Results
Smt Vijaya Chowta vs American Express Foreign Exchange Services
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-02-2024
RAO ROAD, MANGALORE - 03. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. H. MALATESH, ADVOCATE) AND:Digitally signed by 1. SHAKAMBARI AMERICAN EXPRESS FOREIGN EXCHANGE SERVICES Location: HIGH INDIA LTD.COURT OF KARNATAKA (FORMERLY KNOWN AS T.T. FOREX LIMITED) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE
Jasjit Singh and anr. Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Board and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-31-2006
Reported in: 2007(3)ALLMR214; 2007(3)BomCR854
Mhase S.B., J.1. These three appeals have been directed as against the order passed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board on April 29, 1980 in Appeal Nos. 329, 371 and 372 of 1979. These three … 29, 1980 in Appeal Nos. 329, 371 and 372 of 1979. These three appeals were filed before the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board by the appellants as against the orders passed by the Assistant Director of Enforcement under
Dodsal (P.) Ltd. Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation, Appellate Board
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-22-2002
Reported in: [2004]52SCL466(Bom)
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This appeal under Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to FERA) takes exception to the judgment and order dated 2-4-1987 in Appeal … takes exception to the judgment and order dated 2-4-1987 in Appeal No. 72 of 1980 passed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board against the Order No. SDF (S) 1/ 61/72/79 dated 29-12-1979 of the Special Director of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
S Bhaskar Vs. Enforcement Directorate Foreign Exchange Management Act ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-17-2011
Reported in: 2011ILR(Kar)2129; 2011(3)KCCR339(DB)(SC); 2011(4)KantLJ621
RAMESH, J 1. This appeal filed under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (‘the Act’ for short) is directed against the order dated 16.2.2004 passed by the Appellate … 1999 (‘the Act’ for short) is directed against the order dated 16.2.2004 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi, in Revision Petition No. 165/2003. By the said order, the Appellate Tribunal has allowed the Revision
Allana Sons (Private) Ltd. Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate B ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-04-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)BomCR17; [1994]80CompCas274(Bom); 1993(2)MhLj1085
S.W. Puranik, J.1. These three appeals arise out of the order of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board (FERA Board or Appellant Board), first respondent, dated April 23, 1992, holding, inter alia, the … respondent, dated April 23, 1992, holding, inter alia, the appellants guilty of contravention of section 18(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA), imposing penalty upon them and ordering its recovery. The appellant in First Appeal No.
M/S. Worldwide Traders, Bangalore Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appe ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-18-1999
Reported in: [2001]104CompCas245(Kar); ILR1999KAR3032; 1999(6)KarLJ512
appellant was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 1,51,000/-. The appeal preferred by the appellant to the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Court in Appeal No. FERB 524 of 1989 came to be dismissed confirming the order passed … the appeal itself is not maintainable as it does not satisfy the requirement of Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, (hereinafter referred as 'the Act'). In support of this argument, he relied on a decision
World Wide Traders Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board, Mi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-18-1999
Reported in: 1999(66)ECC517
appellant was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 1,51,000. The appeal preferred by the appellant to the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Court in Appeal No. FERB 524/89 came to be dismissed confirming the order passed by the … the appeal itself is not maintainable as it does not satisfy the requirement of Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, (herein after referred as 'the Act'). In support of this argument, he relied on a
Lakh Raj Agarwal Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-08-2000
Reported in: 2001IIAD(Delhi)334; 89(2001)DLT392; 2001(75)ECC517
ORDERDalveer Bhandari, J. (Oral)1. This appeal is directed against the order of the Chairman, Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board dated 21.12.1976.2. The charge against the appellant is that during the year 1969 the appellant … to Rs.15,000/- from a person resident in India and thereby contravened the provisions of section 5(1)(aa) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947.3. The Assistant Director of Enforcement by his order dated 31.12.1976 held the appellant guilty of
A. Abdullah Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-1996
Reported in: 1996CriLJ4378
Abdul Hadi, J. 1. This civil miscellaneous appeal under section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), is against the concurrent orders of the second respondent … statement was recorded on January 24, 1985, itself, when a sum of Rs. 60,000 in cash besides some foreign exchange was recovered from his possession. There is nothing to show that in fact the appellant was detained by
M. Sathiyamoorthy Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-1995
Reported in: [1996]85CompCas142(Mad); 1995(79)ELT365(Mad)
case of the petitioner is that the second respondent initiated proceedings against the petitioner for contravention of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). After a full-fledged enquiry, he has passed an order
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free