Foreign Exchange - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: foreign exchange Page 1 of about 46 results (0.020 seconds)D. Dorairaj Vs. the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board (South ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: 1987(13)ECC130
and was holding the shares during the commencement of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. When the appellant was contacted by for the appellent is that Section 19(1)(e) of the Foreign Exchange Act, 1973 could not be invoked in respect of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDodsal (P.) Ltd. Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation, Appellate Board
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: [2004]52SCL466(Bom)
whereas the Appellants have been found guilty of 'lending' of foreign exchange, which charge is materially different from the one originally for contending that there was permission also for spending foreign exchange or selling or lending foreign exchange to any person abroad.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEscorts Ltd. Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board
Court: Delhi
Reported in: [1985]57CompCas684(Delhi); 24(1983)DLT321; 1985(5)ECC141
for. 10. The Act is designed to safeguard and conserve foreign exchange which is essential to the economic life of a 10. The Act is designed to safeguard and conserve foreign exchange which is essential to the economic life of a developing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTW.R. Bouri Vs. Chairman, Foreign Exchange Regulations Appellate Board
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Reported in: 1984(3)ECC84; 1985(19)ELT369(P& H)
This is a second appeal under Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, (hereinafter called the Act), against the * * *(b) the making of any payment with foreign exchange received by way of salary or payment for services not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAllana Sons (Private) Ltd. Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate B ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 1993(3)BomCR17; [1994]80CompCas274(Bom); 1993(2)MhLj1085
securing non-payment of the value of the goods exported in foreign currency. 21. Section 18(2) of the FERA reads as under have immobilised the from proceeding further in recovering the foreign exchange directly that they have been constrained to file civil suit
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and Ano ...
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 1987(12)ECC384
and possession delivered. 2. Somehow or other,the officers of the Foreign Exchange Enforcement Branch came to know of this transaction. On possession delivered. 2. Somehow or other,the officers of the Foreign Exchange Enforcement Branch came to know of this transaction. On enquiry,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS Bhaskar Vs. Enforcement Directorate Foreign Exchange Management Act ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: 2011ILR(Kar)2129; 2011(3)KCCR339(DB)(SC); 2011(4)KantLJ621
Deputy Director insofar as it related to release of the foreign currency by ordering confiscation of the seized currency of Us Directorate carried the matter to the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi by filing a Revision Petition under Section 19(6)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorld Wide Traders Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board, Mi ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: 1999(66)ECC517
having taken steps to recover the same and that two foreign buyers had gone into liquidation. After issuing show cause notice be allowed to syphon away a part of the foreign exchange or to deprive the nation of the foreign exchange earned
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and anr ...
Court: Delhi
Reported in: [1990]68CompCas46(Delhi); 32(1987)DLT278; 1987RLR270
Das has contravened the provisions of Section 9(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.'(4) In view of this finding the (2) Somehow or the other the officers of the Foreign Exchange Enforcement Branch, came to know of this transaction. On enquiry
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLakh Raj Agarwal Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2001IIAD(Delhi)334; 89(2001)DLT392; 2001(75)ECC517
Against that order an appeal was preferred to the Chairman, Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board. The order passed by the Assistant appeal is directed against the order of the Chairman, Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board dated 21.12.1976.2. The charge against the appellant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>