Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Foreign Exchange - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 31 2006

Jasjit Singh and anr. Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Board and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-31-2006

Reported in: 2007(3)ALLMR214; 2007(3)BomCR854

Mhase S.B., J.1. These three appeals have been directed as against the order passed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board on April 29, 1980 in Appeal Nos. 329, 371 and 372 of 1979. These three … 29, 1980 in Appeal Nos. 329, 371 and 372 of 1979. These three appeals were filed before the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board by the appellants as against the orders passed by the Assistant Director of Enforcement under


Jul 22 2002

Dodsal (P.) Ltd. Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation, Appellate Board

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-22-2002

Reported in: [2004]52SCL466(Bom)

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This appeal under Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to FERA) takes exception to the judgment and order dated 2-4-1987 in Appeal … takes exception to the judgment and order dated 2-4-1987 in Appeal No. 72 of 1980 passed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board against the Order No. SDF (S) 1/ 61/72/79 dated 29-12-1979 of the Special Director of


Mar 17 2011

S Bhaskar Vs. Enforcement Directorate Foreign Exchange Management Act ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-17-2011

Reported in: 2011ILR(Kar)2129; 2011(3)KCCR339(DB)(SC); 2011(4)KantLJ621

RAMESH, J 1. This appeal filed under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (‘the Act’ for short) is directed against the order dated 16.2.2004 passed by the Appellate … 1999 (‘the Act’ for short) is directed against the order dated 16.2.2004 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi, in Revision Petition No. 165/2003. By the said order, the Appellate Tribunal has allowed the Revision


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 04 1993

Allana Sons (Private) Ltd. Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate B ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-04-1993

Reported in: 1993(3)BomCR17; [1994]80CompCas274(Bom); 1993(2)MhLj1085

S.W. Puranik, J.1. These three appeals arise out of the order of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board (FERA Board or Appellant Board), first respondent, dated April 23, 1992, holding, inter alia, the … respondent, dated April 23, 1992, holding, inter alia, the appellants guilty of contravention of section 18(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA), imposing penalty upon them and ordering its recovery. The appellant in First Appeal No.


Jun 18 1999

M/S. Worldwide Traders, Bangalore Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appe ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-18-1999

Reported in: [2001]104CompCas245(Kar); ILR1999KAR3032; 1999(6)KarLJ512

appellant was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 1,51,000/-. The appeal preferred by the appellant to the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Court in Appeal No. FERB 524 of 1989 came to be dismissed confirming the order passed … the appeal itself is not maintainable as it does not satisfy the requirement of Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, (hereinafter referred as 'the Act'). In support of this argument, he relied on a decision


Jun 18 1999

World Wide Traders Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board, Mi ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-18-1999

Reported in: 1999(66)ECC517

appellant was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 1,51,000. The appeal preferred by the appellant to the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Court in Appeal No. FERB 524/89 came to be dismissed confirming the order passed by the … the appeal itself is not maintainable as it does not satisfy the requirement of Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, (herein after referred as 'the Act'). In support of this argument, he relied on a


Sep 08 2000

Lakh Raj Agarwal Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-08-2000

Reported in: 2001IIAD(Delhi)334; 89(2001)DLT392; 2001(75)ECC517

ORDERDalveer Bhandari, J. (Oral)1. This appeal is directed against the order of the Chairman, Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board dated 21.12.1976.2. The charge against the appellant is that during the year 1969 the appellant … to Rs.15,000/- from a person resident in India and thereby contravened the provisions of section 5(1)(aa) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947.3. The Assistant Director of Enforcement by his order dated 31.12.1976 held the appellant guilty of


Feb 29 1996

A. Abdullah Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and Anothe ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-29-1996

Reported in: 1996CriLJ4378

Abdul Hadi, J. 1. This civil miscellaneous appeal under section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), is against the concurrent orders of the second respondent … statement was recorded on January 24, 1985, itself, when a sum of Rs. 60,000 in cash besides some foreign exchange was recovered from his possession. There is nothing to show that in fact the appellant was detained by


Jul 06 1995

M. Sathiyamoorthy Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-06-1995

Reported in: [1996]85CompCas142(Mad); 1995(79)ELT365(Mad)

case of the petitioner is that the second respondent initiated proceedings against the petitioner for contravention of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). After a full-fledged enquiry, he has passed an order


Mar 16 1989

S. Muthiah Pillai Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board and ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-16-1989

Reported in: (1989)2MLJ41

Nainar Sundaram, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is one preferred under Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The appellant faced three charges before the Additional Director of Enforcement. Of the three charges, … as follows:that during March, 1963, the appellant, in contravention of Section 5(1)(aa) read with Section 23B of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, attempted to receive a sum of Rs. 40,000 from a person other than an authorised


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial