Foreign Company - Judgment Search Results
Hindustan Shipyard Ltd Vs. Etpm, a Foreign Company
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-19-1993
Reported in: 1994(2)BomCR546
the amounts covered by the said invoices due to 'Financial constraints and delay in receipt of permission concerning foreign exchange.' (b) Thus, the petitioner failed to pay the amounts covered by various invoices concerning the execution of … Retried Chief Justice of India as an Umpire. The learned Arbitrators partly allowed the claim of the respondent company for interest in respect of late payments. The learned Arbitrators held that the petitioners had delayed payment of
Hamburg Bulk Carriers Gmbh Foreign Company Vs. Vishal Exports Overseas ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Nov-03-2004
Reported in: 2005(2)ARBLR394(Gujarat); (2005)2GLR954
Matched in: Parties Hamburg Bulk Carriers Gmbh Foreign Company Vs. Vishal Exports Overseas Ltd.
i.B.M. World Trade Corporation Vs. N.D. Bhatt, Inspecting Assistant Co ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-01-1981
Reported in: (1982)27CTR(Bom)228; [1982]138ITR742(Bom)
filed a return dated September 12, 1980, sworn by Shri S. K. Tyagi, Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Foreign Companies Range I, Bombay.4. It would be convenient to consider the grievance of the petitioner, first in respect … Pendse, J.1. The petitioner is a company incorporated under the laws of the United States of America and carries on in India the business of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jupiter Denizcilik Mumessillik San. Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi a Compa ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-08-2006
Reported in: 2007(2)ALLMR215; 2007(3)BomCR717
the time when the suit was filed, in the port and harbour Kandala. The second defendant is a foreign company organised under the foreign law and are the owners of first defendant vessel. According to the plaintiff, the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free