For The Time Being - Judgment Search Results

Times Internet Ltd. Vs. Time Broadband Services Pvt.Ltd.

Court: Delhi

2014 DECIDED ON : January 29 , 2015 + CS(OS) 2004/2006 & IA Nos.2620/2007 (u/O6R17 & 11806/2006 (u/O39R1&2) TIMES INTERNET LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Abhinav Hansaria, Advocate. versus TIME BROADBAND SERVICES PVT.LTD. ..... Defendant Through :

Times Publishing House Ltd Vs. Financial Times Ltd and Others

Court: Delhi

final disposal of the challenge before IPAB. If, on the other hand, no such plea is pending at the time of filing of the suit (for infringement)- the court has to examine. If urged in the written statement, … grants time to the party to approach the IPAB, and it does not so approach the court within the time, it loses the right to argue that the suit is to be stayed. This view finds support from

The Financial Times Ltd. Vs.times Publishing House Ltd.

Court: Delhi

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h October, 2016 W.P.(C) No.2737/2012 THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.S. Raman, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aparajitha Vishwanath, Mr. Gaurav Mukherjee, Mr. J.V.

Times Publishing House Ltd. Vs.the Financial Times Ltd.

Court: Delhi

+ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h October, 2016 W.P.(C) No.2745/2012 TIMES PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Mr. K. Datta, Mr. Shashi P. Ojha and Mr.

The Financial Times Ltd. Vs.the Times Publishing House Ltd.

Court: Delhi

would be carried forward to the IPAB; and, (iii) what was the stage at which TRA/6/2005/TM/DEL were, at the time of transfer from this Court to IPAB.11. The counsel for TPHL, post verification, informed (a) that this Court … was a substantive right and which was preserved by Section 100 of TMA; and, (c) that TRA/6/2005/TM/DEL at the time of transfer to IPAB was at the stage of filing of affidavits of evidence.12. Per contra, the senior

Times Publishing House Limited vs.the Financial Times Ltd.

Court: Delhi

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:7. h October, 2016 W.P.(C) No.3483/2012 TIMES PUBLISHING HOUSE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Mr. K. Datta, Mr. Shashi P. Ojha and Mr.

Times Publishing House Limited, Bangalore Vs. the Financial Times Limi ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1999(2)KarLJ422

Bangalore in O. S. No. 7087 of 1993 rejecting the application.2. The brief facts are as follows:The plaintiff-Financial Times Limited, London (for short, 'London') filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendant-Times Publishing House Limited, Bangalore

Times Publishing House Ltd. Vs. the Financial Times Ltd.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1994KAR2068; 1995(1)KarLJ219

is a prohibition of registration of a mark the use of which would be contrary to any law for the time being in force.Section 12 prohibits the registration of identical or deceptively similar trade marks.Section 46 provides removal from register

Times Publishing House Ltd. Vs. the Financial Times Ltd. and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1998KAR3212

Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore in O.S.No. 7087/93 rejecting the application.2. The brief facts are as follows:The plaintiff-Financial Times Ltd., London (for short London) filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendant-Times Publishing House Ltd., Bangalore

Times Publishing House Ltd., Vs. the Financial Times Limited and Anoth ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

S. Usha, Vice-Chairman 1. The instant rectification application has been filed for rectification of the trade mark ‘Financial Times registered under No.468937 in class 16 under the provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to