Footed - Judgment Search Results

Foote and Co., Inc. Vs. Stanley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the unreasonableness of inspection fees may appear from the language of the act as in foote v clagett 116 md 228 where a charge of two cents a bushel on oysters ..... stanley 232 u s 494 1914 u s supreme court foote co inc v stanley 232 u s 494 1914 d e foote company incorporated v stanley no 159 argued january 16 .....

Silsby Vs. Foote

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the united states for the northern district of new york syllabus foote s patent declared good for the combination of machinery used in ..... have closed and the heat shall continue to rise c elisha foote jr afterwards in march 1847 he filed the following disclaimer to ..... the commissioner of patents the petition of elisha foote of seneca falls in the county of seneca and state of .....

Silsby Vs. Foote

Court: US Supreme Court

..... certified copy of the following disclaimer to the commissioner of patents the petition of elisha foote of seneca falls in the county of seneca and state of new york respectfully represents ..... united states agreeably to the act of congress in that case made and provided elisha foote witnesses morris newton edwin l baltink the defendants objected upon the ground that the instrument .....

Silsby Vs. Foote

Court: US Supreme Court

..... u s 290 1857 u s supreme court silsby v foote 61 u s 20 how 290 290 1857 silsby v foote 61 u s 20 how 290 appeal from the circuit .....

Foote Vs. Egery

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 65 u s 267 1860 u s supreme court foote v egery 65 u s 24 how 267 267 1860 foote v egery 5 u s 24 how 267 error to the .....

Rightway Vs. Rightways Foot Wear and anr.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: AIR1986J& K71

..... summarised as under the plaintiff is a firm which conducts partnership business it is manufacturing foot wears and travelling luggage and conducts sale of manufactured goods such as footwear travelling luggage ..... the plaintiff s trademark was not registered whereas the defendant s trademark as new rightway foot ware is registered therefore also the suit of the plaintiff is resisted 4 objections also .....

A.B. Foot Style (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1999(65)ECC367,1999(111)ELT684(Cal)

..... 2 each of the petitioners company which is a manufacturer of foot wear chappals and duly registered with the central excise department ..... actual financial position of the company it has proceeded on the footing that the company is making profit but the balance sheet ..... of undue hardship afresh the appellate authority must proceed on the footing that each of the appellants has a strong prima facie .....

M/S Jain Foot Comforts Pvt. Ltd. Vs.smt. Jagwati Jain & Anr

Court: Delhi

..... august 2019 cs comm 860 2018 i a 156 2019 m s jain foot comforts pvt ltd plaintiff through mr randhir jain and mr dhananjay jain ..... suit for recovery has been filed by the plaintiff m s jain foot comforts pvt ltd seeking recovery of a sum of rs 3 97 ..... agents at or before the hearing of the case stand on a higher footing than evidentiary admissions the former class of admissions are fully binding on .....

Valancherry Foot Ball Association Vs. Valancherry Grama Panchayath

Court: Kerala

..... p s o kunjimohammed aged47years vadakkepeediyekkal house p o thozhuvannoor valancherry p o secretary valancherry foot ball association valancherry malappuram district by advs sri k gopalakrishna kurup sri s manu smt ..... 2010 c dated this the 9th day of december 2013 judgment the petitioner is a foot ball association challenging exts p9 and p10 sanction and acquisition proceedings initiated against the .....

M/S Gulati Shoes & Anr vs.m/s Foot Print

Court: Delhi

..... 2017 m s gulati shoes anr through mr subodh kumar advocate appellants versus m s foot print respondent through mr gurmeet singh ahuja advocate with mr rajan kumar in person coram ..... respondent drawn in favour of mr rajan kumar the partner of the respondent m s foot print and are duly accepted by him rfa222017 page 1 of 2 3 counsel for .....