Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Footed - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

1852

Silsby Vs. Foote

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1852

Silsby v. Foote - 55 U.S. 218 (1852) U.S. Supreme Court Silsby v. Foote, 55 U.S. 14 How. 218 218 (1852)


1857

Silsby Vs. Foote

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1857

Silsby v. Foote - 61 U.S. 378 (1857) U.S. Supreme Court Silsby v. Foote, 61 U.S. 20 How. 378 378 (1857)


1857

Silsby Vs. Foote

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1857

Silsby v. Foote - 61 U.S. 290 (1857) U.S. Supreme Court Silsby v. Foote, 61 U.S. 20 How. 290 290 (1857)


18-section briefs on any result in this list

1860

Foote Vs. Egery

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1860

Foote v. Egery - 65 U.S. 267 (1860) U.S. Supreme Court Foote v. Egery, 65 U.S. 24 How. 267


Jan 23 2024

Sakthi Foot Weares vs the Union of India

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-23-2024

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 3RD MAGHA, 1945 PETITIONER: SAKTHI FOOT WEARES KALLAR P.O, THOOKKUPALA, KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR JENNY JAIJU, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.JAIJU D.ARACKAL, ARACKAL


Jul 13 2022

Smart Foot Wear Marketing vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-13-2022

WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 36123 OF 2018 PETITIONER: SMART FOOT WEAR MARKETING ERAVIMANGALAM ROAD, KOZHUKULLY P.O., THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER. BY ADV M.JITHESH MENON RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE


Dec 09 2004

Rajpath Foot Path Byabasai Sangha Vs. State of Orissa and Three ors.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Dec-09-2004

Reported in: 2005(I)OLR21

ORDER1. Heard Mr. A. Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. D. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the B.D.A. and Mr. P. K. Jena, learned counsel for the Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation.2. The petitioner is a registered society...


Nov 26 2013

Kerala Rubber Foot Wear Manufacturers Vs. the State of Kerala and Othe ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-26-2013

TUESDAY, THE26H DAY OF NOVEMBER20135TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 11183 of 2011 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. KERALA RUBBER FOOT WEAR MANUFACTURERS AND EXPORTERS ASSOCIATION, MONALINGAL, CALICUT-673 032, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.2. M/S.JOSCO RUBBERS, MONALINGAL, CALICUT-673 032, REPRESENTED


Dec 09 2013

Valancherry Foot Ball Association Vs. Valancherry Grama Panchayath

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Dec-09-2013

CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE9H DAY OF DECEMBER201318TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 9827 of 2010 (C) --------------------------- PETITIONERS: -------------------------- 1. VALANCHERRY FOOT BALL ASSOCIATION REG. NO.93/87, VALANCHERRY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, ABOOBACKER HAJI, S/O.CHEKKUTTY AGED70YEARS, NADUTHODI HOUSE,


Sep 05 1995

Tannary and Foot Wear Corporation Vs. T. Rudra, Chairman Cum Managing ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-05-1995

Reported in: 1996CriLJ1601

is that a dispute arose regarding the revision of the salaries of the employees of the Tannary & Foot Wear Corporation of India Ltd., a Government of India undertaking, (hereinafter called as 'the Corporation). The applicant filed


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial