Followed - Judgment Search Results

Smt. Shantabai Ramlal Pardeshi (Since Deceased by Her Following Heirs ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(6)BomCR485; 2008(2)MhLj422

V.M. Kanade, J.1. This is an application for restoration of the writ petition which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 12th September, 2007. For reasons stated in para 3 of the application, the writ petition...

Following these Orders This Court Has Already Vs. Union of India and O ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of 2006 (Commander Works Engineer, Air Force, Chandigarh and others versus Darshan Singh and otheRs.and other connected cases. Following the above-cited decisions, the present writ petition is also dismissed. As regard to the arrears of pay, we

Following Terms:- Vs. State of Haryana --respondent

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Officer recorded the statement of Partap Singh, Driver of Passenger Train No.54512, Nangal Dam to Ambala to the following effect:- “It is stated that I am working as a driver in Railway. On 07.04.2013, while I was

“6.The Following Are the Broad Principles when a Writ Vs. Union of I ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

time gives a special and particular remedy for enforcing it the remedy provided by the statute must be followed, and it is not competent to the party to pursue the course applicable to cases of the second

All Manipur Jail Executive and Followers' Association and Ors. Vs. Sta ...

Court: Guwahati

Agarwal, J.1. A few Warders of Manipur Central Jail, under the umbrella of All Manipur Jail Executive and Followers Association, Imphal have filed this writ application seeking a writ in the nature of prohibition so as to

on 28.01.2013 the Following Order Was Passed:- Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Ajay Tewari, J. (Oral).On 28.01.2013 the following order was passed:- “The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.287 dated 22.11.2011, under Sections

on 22.03.2013 This Court Passed the Following Order: Vs. State of Punj ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

life of the petitioners at the behest of respondents No.4 to 10. On 22.03.2013, this Court passed the following order: “In compliance of order dated 04.03.2013, petitioner No.2 has produced copy of FDR for a sum of

Exchequer This Court Issued the Following Directions in the Aforesaid ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of a disadvantage workman and the impact of back wages on the State exchequer, this Court issued the following directions in the aforesaid case: “The Forest Department will remain at liberty to fix responsibility and recover arrears

on 30.01.2013 the Following Order Was Passed:- Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Ajay Tewari, J. (Oral).On 30.01.2013 the following order was passed:- “ The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.116 dated 05.11.2012, under

In Suresh Kumar's case (supra) were as follows:- Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

services of daily wage employees. The observations of the Division Bench in Suresh Kumar's case (supra) were as follows:- CWP No.24557 of 2012 (O&M) -4- “5. We have given serious thought to the respective arguments. It is