Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Follow - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 01 1970

Smt. Shantabai Ramlal Pardeshi (Since Deceased by Her Following Heirs ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-01-1970

Reported in: 2007(6)BomCR485; 2008(2)MhLj422

V.M. Kanade, J.1. This is an application for restoration of the writ petition which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 12th September, 2007. For reasons stated in para 3 of the application, the writ petition...


Aug 19 2013

Following these Orders This Court Has Already Vs. Union of India and O ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-19-2013

of 2006 (Commander Works Engineer, Air Force, Chandigarh and others versus Darshan Singh and otheRs.and other connected cases. Following the above-cited decisions, the present writ petition is also dismissed. As regard to the arrears of pay, we


Jan 21 2014

Following Terms:- Vs. State of Haryana --respondent

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-21-2014

Officer recorded the statement of Partap Singh, Driver of Passenger Train No.54512, Nangal Dam to Ambala to the following effect:- “It is stated that I am working as a driver in Railway. On 07.04.2013, while I was


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 13 2014

“6.The Following Are the Broad Principles when a Writ Vs. Union of I ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-13-2014

writ petition where alternate statutory remedy was available, had in paras 6 and 7 observed as under:- “6.The following are the broad principles when a writ petition can be entertained without insisting for adopting statutory remedies:- i)


Mar 15 2007

All Manipur Jail Executive and Followers' Association and Ors. Vs. Sta ...

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Mar-15-2007

Agarwal, J.1. A few Warders of Manipur Central Jail, under the umbrella of All Manipur Jail Executive and Followers Association, Imphal have filed this writ application seeking a writ in the nature of prohibition so as to


Mar 19 2013

on 28.01.2013 the Following Order Was Passed:- Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-19-2013

Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Ajay Tewari, J. (Oral).On 28.01.2013 the following order was passed:- “The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.287 dated 22.11.2011, under Sections


Apr 30 2013

on 22.03.2013 This Court Passed the Following Order: Vs. State of Punj ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-30-2013

life of the petitioners at the behest of respondents No.4 to 10. On 22.03.2013, this Court passed the following order: “In compliance of order dated 04.03.2013, petitioner No.2 has produced copy of FDR for a sum of


May 29 2013

Exchequer This Court Issued the Following Directions in the Aforesaid ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-29-2013

of a disadvantage workman and the impact of back wages on the State exchequer, this Court issued the following directions in the aforesaid case: “The Forest Department will remain at liberty to fix responsibility and recover arrears


Mar 20 2013

on 30.01.2013 the Following Order Was Passed:- Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-20-2013

Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Ajay Tewari, J. (Oral).On 30.01.2013 the following order was passed:- “ The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.116 dated 05.11.2012, under


Oct 03 2013

In Suresh Kumar's case (supra) were as follows:- Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

services of daily wage employees. The observations of the Division Bench in Suresh Kumar's case (supra) were as follows:- CWP No.24557 of 2012 (O&M) -4- “5. We have given serious thought to the respective arguments. It is


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial