Follow - Judgment Search Results
Smt. Shantabai Ramlal Pardeshi (Since Deceased by Her Following Heirs ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-01-1970
Reported in: 2007(6)BomCR485; 2008(2)MhLj422
V.M. Kanade, J.1. This is an application for restoration of the writ petition which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 12th September, 2007. For reasons stated in para 3 of the application, the writ petition...
Following these Orders This Court Has Already Vs. Union of India and O ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
of 2006 (Commander Works Engineer, Air Force, Chandigarh and others versus Darshan Singh and otheRs.and other connected cases. Following the above-cited decisions, the present writ petition is also dismissed. As regard to the arrears of pay, we
Following Terms:- Vs. State of Haryana --respondent
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
Officer recorded the statement of Partap Singh, Driver of Passenger Train No.54512, Nangal Dam to Ambala to the following effect:- “It is stated that I am working as a driver in Railway. On 07.04.2013, while I was
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“6.The Following Are the Broad Principles when a Writ Vs. Union of I ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
writ petition where alternate statutory remedy was available, had in paras 6 and 7 observed as under:- “6.The following are the broad principles when a writ petition can be entertained without insisting for adopting statutory remedies:- i)
All Manipur Jail Executive and Followers' Association and Ors. Vs. Sta ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Mar-15-2007
Agarwal, J.1. A few Warders of Manipur Central Jail, under the umbrella of All Manipur Jail Executive and Followers Association, Imphal have filed this writ application seeking a writ in the nature of prohibition so as to
on 28.01.2013 the Following Order Was Passed:- Vs. State of Punjab and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Ajay Tewari, J. (Oral).On 28.01.2013 the following order was passed:- “The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.287 dated 22.11.2011, under Sections
on 22.03.2013 This Court Passed the Following Order: Vs. State of Punj ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
life of the petitioners at the behest of respondents No.4 to 10. On 22.03.2013, this Court passed the following order: “In compliance of order dated 04.03.2013, petitioner No.2 has produced copy of FDR for a sum of
Exchequer This Court Issued the Following Directions in the Aforesaid ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-29-2013
of a disadvantage workman and the impact of back wages on the State exchequer, this Court issued the following directions in the aforesaid case: “The Forest Department will remain at liberty to fix responsibility and recover arrears
on 30.01.2013 the Following Order Was Passed:- Vs. State of Punjab and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Ajay Tewari, J. (Oral).On 30.01.2013 the following order was passed:- “ The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.116 dated 05.11.2012, under
In Suresh Kumar's case (supra) were as follows:- Vs. State of Punjab a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
services of daily wage employees. The observations of the Division Bench in Suresh Kumar's case (supra) were as follows:- CWP No.24557 of 2012 (O&M) -4- “5. We have given serious thought to the respective arguments. It is
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free