Skip to content

Fly For It - Judgment Search Results

Jan 29 1940

Fly Vs. Heitmeyer

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-29-1940

U.S. 146 (1940) ft:Fly v. Heitmeyer, 309 U.S. 146 (1940) Fly v. Heitmeyer No. 316 Argued January 11, 1940 Decided January


Jan 08 1985

Park N' Fly Inc. Vs. Dollar Park and Fly, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-08-1985

and flies from the airport. We conclude that Park 'N Fly's mark used in the context of airport parking is, at


Mar 21 2014

Nasik Fly Ash Bricks Association Through Its President Sunil Mendhekar ...

Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on: Mar-21-2014

use fly ash bricks or blocks or tiles or clay fly ash bricks, etc., subject to a minimum percentage mentioned in


Feb 01 2013

Hi Tech Fly Ash India Enterprises Pvt. Limited Vs. Chairman of Tamil N ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-01-2013

ESP sub-division = Rs.23/ton 5)Establishment charges of AHP division regarding fly ash Management & security system = Rs.24/ton 6)Maintenance charges for


Jul 05 2018

Delhi Flying Club Ltd vs.union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-05-2018

hear and decide the appeal as filed by the Delhi Flying Club in March, 2018 against the orders dated 6/1/2017 in


Feb 06 2013

Flying Officer Vishnupriya Srinivasan (Aged 24 Years) Daughter Vs. Par ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-06-2013

A1 would be a full standard of fitness of all flying duties. The Court while assessing the compensation provided for `20,000/-


Mar 16 1980

Andhra Pradesh Flying Club Vs. S.C. Saxena

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-16-1980

Reported in: (1980)IILLJ337AP

that his client could get an alternative employment as Chief Flying Instructor, in Delhi Club . To repeat, there is no


Jun 21 2005

Fly Wheel Travels Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-21-2005

Reported in: 2005(5)ALD171

further submits that Abdul Rahman Saleem as proprietor of M/s Fly Wheel Travels, Hyderabad has furnished certain information with regard to


Mar 17 2009

Mwo (Honorary Flying Officer) Amarjit Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-17-2009

Reported in: (2009)154PLR206

invalidating from service, the petitioner held the Rank of Honorary Flying Officer and, therefore, the most favourable condition, in the context


1867

The Flying Scud

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1867

Scud - 73 U.S. 263 (1867) U.S. Supreme Court The Flying Scud, 73 U.S. 6 Wall. 263 263 (1867) The Flying


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial