Fixture - Judgment Search Results

Soma Plumbing Fixtures Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)(19)ECC293

1. The central issue, which is common to all the 7 appeals listed above, is whether chrome-plated flush bends manufactured and cleared by the appellants were classifiable under Item 26 A(3) [as pipes and tubes] or...

Aarkay Plumbing Fixtures Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1997)(96)ELT364TriDel

1. Appellant filed this appeal against Order-in-Appeal No.127-CE/KAN/95, dated 28-12-1995 in the impugned order the benefit of deem credit order in respect of brass scraps was denied on the ground that the scrap is generated on...

Commissioner, Trade Tax Vs. Mercury Lighting Fixtures

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2009)26VST412(All)

Prakesh Krishna, J.1. Heard the counsel for the parties and perused the record.2. The dealer-opposite party was carrying on the business of manufacturing and sale of electrical goods. It was a 'new unit' within the meaning...

Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus. Vs. Skylite Electro Fixtures Pvt.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(132)ELT90Tri(Mum.)bai

1. In the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the benefit of Notification 175/86 or 1/93 (whichever is applicable at the time of clearance) could not be denied to the electrical light fittings manufactured...

M/S Keselec Lighting Fixtures Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporatio ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.599 of 1985 Reserved on:13. 08.2013 Date of decision:31. 08.2013 M/s Keselec Lighting Fixtures ....Appellant Versus Employees State Insurance Corporation ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1 Whether Reporters of the

Gold Line Bath Fixtures (P) Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2007)(121)ECC307

1. The appellant challenges the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) made on 30.11.2004, upholding the order-in-original by which it was held that, modvat credit of Rs. 1,37,741/- on capital goods was not admissible to the appellant...