Skip to content


First Hearing - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: first hearing Page 1 of about 311 results (0.042 seconds)
1868

Ex Parte Bradley

Court: US Supreme Court

pursuing this branch of the case further, our conclusion is: First. That the judges of the court below exceeded their authority rule of the court served on him, and having been heard at the bar in support of his answer, it is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1871

Ex Parte Newman

Court: US Supreme Court

the opinion of the Court. Attempt was made in the first place to prosecute the suit in the name of the well pleaded, and if the relator elects to proceed to hearing on the return, without pleading to the same in any

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1873

Ex Parte Lange

Court: US Supreme Court

during the existence of the term at which they are first made, is undeniable. And this is the extent of the when the two district judges sat with him on the hearing, and the writ was discharged and the petitioner remanded to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 1883 (FN)

Ex Parte Wall

Court: US Supreme Court

to issue the rule and require him to answer it, first because the rule did not show that the matters there you a judge to affirm my guilt, in advance of hearing, upon street rumors? I decline to answer you at all,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 12 1888 (FN)

Ex Parte Terry

Court: US Supreme Court

them; that when petitioner's wife, the said Sarah Althea Terry, first arose from her seat, and before she uttered a word, and while said court was engaged in its regular business hearing and determining causes pending before it, one Sarah Althea Terry

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 1908 (FN)

Ex Parte Young

Court: US Supreme Court

open under our incomparable judicial system to protect that right, first by the judgment of the state court, and ultimately by to the same effect. Various affidavits were received upon the hearing before the court prior to the granting of the temporary

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 15 1911 (FN)

Ex Parte Metropolitan Water Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

the right to such injunction. It follows therefore that, in hearing and determining the application for the temporary injunction, the single

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 20 1911 (FN)

Ex Parte Harding

Court: US Supreme Court

granted. A large amount of evidence was introduced on such hearing, which extended over a period of more than fifteen months,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 16 1913 (FN)

Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co. and Seaman

Court: US Supreme Court

Chatfield or referred to a commissioner to take proof and report. Finally, on March 15, 1912, Judge Chatfield filed an opinion the interposition of a motion to disqualify him between a hearing and a determination of the matter heard. This is the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 1914 (FN)

Ex Parte Roe

Court: US Supreme Court

S. 191 , 220 U. S. 209 ; Ex Parte First National Bank, 228 U. S. 516 . And this is 291, c. 143), and therefore was not removable. After a hearing, the motion was denied for reasons assigned in the second

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //