Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

First Hand - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 19 1962

Harding Vs. Hand

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-19-1962

HARDING v. HAND - 369 U.S. 151 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court HARDING v. HAND, 369 U.S. 151 (1962) 369 U.S. 151


1849

Tyler Vs. Hand

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1849

which exercised the jurisdiction of a circuit court. The declaration contained a count for each separate bond, the first of which was as follows, viz.: "John Tyler, who is a citizen of Virginia, President of the United … Tyler v. Hand - 48 U.S. 573 (1849) U.S. Supreme Court Tyler v. Hand, 48 U.S. 7 How. 573 573 (1849)


May 27 1907

Security Warehousing Co. Vs. Hand

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-27-1907

Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand - 206 U.S. 415 (1907) U.S. Supreme Court Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand, 206 U.S. 415 (1907) Security … and circuit court of appeals, may be found in 143 F. 32, supra. Reference is made to that report for the findings of the referee. The report shows a radically different state of facts from the Wilson


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 29 2011

Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande Alias Handege Vs.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-29-2011

:1. Sushila Vithalrao Hande is alleged to have executed a will on 2 October 2002. The Appellant is named as executor under


Apr 04 1913

Krishna Hande Vs. Padmanabha Hande and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-04-1913

Reported in: (1913)25MLJ442

on the point, but the prices notified in the Government Gazette were awarded by the Lower Courts.2. The first question argued is whether the Lower Courts were right in granting execution to the defendants Nos. 28 to


Jul 10 2019

M/S Hande Wavare and Co. Vs. Ramchandra Vitthal Dongre

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-10-2019

submitted three reports stipulating norms for eligibility for two-time frames which were accepted by the High Court. The first-time frame was 1985-86 to 1994-95 and second time frame was of 1991-92 to 1994-95. For proper appreciation of … COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5350 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.33627 of 2018) M/S HANDE WAVARE & CO. ...Appellant VERSUS RAMCHANDRA VITTHAL DONGRE & ORS. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5351 2019 (Arising out


Oct 21 2019

The Swastik Hand Made Paper Pcis Ltd. & Anr vs.m/s Toyin Woodcraft (In ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-21-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 10.2019 + CO.PET. 169/2001 THE SWASTIK HAND MADE PAPER PCIS LTD. & ANR Through: ........ Petitioners versus M/S TOYIN WOODCRAFT (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent


Jun 18 2012

Sarjerao Janardhan Hande and Others Vs. Maharashtra State Co-operative ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-18-2012

apart from the claim so raised. This dispute, in my; view just cannot be gone into for the first time in the proceedings like this. 7 If case is made out in a given case, the Court, … in Writ Petition No.950/2008 with Writ Petition No.1514/2008 M/s. Maharashtra State Co-op. Marketing Federation Ltd. vs. Sarjerao Janardhan Hande and anr. , is of no assistance in view of the distinguishing facts and circumstances. That was not


Jul 06 2000

Parvatibai Maruti Hande Vs. Satish Mohanram Prajapati

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-06-2000

Reported in: (2001)4BOMLR516

P.W. 1 and P.W. 2 respectively in support that the suit notice was duly served. On the other hand, defendant examined D.W. 1 Mohanram, who is the father of respondent herein. The Trial Court, after considering the


Feb 08 1993

Fibre Hand (Sales) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chand Rani

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-08-1993

Reported in: AIR1993Delhi201; 50(1993)DLT68; 1993(25)DRJ382; 1993RLR228

considered it expedient to address itself to this question. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance in the first instance on two decisions of the Supreme Court reported as 43 (1991) Dlt 447, S.Surjit Singh Kaira vs. … That period is already over. thereforee, grant fresh period of two months to the petitioner from today to hand over vacant possession of the tenancy premises to respondent No. 1. INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - Welfare legislation should


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial