Filing - Judgment Search Results
Pollard's Lessee Vs. Files
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1844
Pollard's Lessee v. Files - 43 U.S. 591 (1844) U.S. Supreme Court Pollard's Lessee v. Files, 43 U.S. 2 How. 591 591
Southern Filed Ventures (P) Ltd., vs Smt.Beenakumari S.,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-01-2023
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 5307 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: SOUTHERN FILED VENTURES (P) LTD., MERCHISTEN ESTATE, PONMUDI P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 551, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY ADVS. N.ANILKUMAR
“heard. Judicial File Perused. Applicant Vs. VipIn Kumar and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
for the petitioner. Mr.Gulzar Mohd. Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms.Harsimrat Rai, DAG, Punjab. **** SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.P.C.') challenging the order
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“perusal of File Reveals That the Star Witness of This Case Vs. Amar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
judgment under challenge. Otherwise also, no plausible explanation has been furnished for causing delay of 85 days in filing the appeal. Accordingly, both the applications are dismissed. (Jasbir Singh) Judge (Tejinder Singh Dhindsa) Judge 10.12.2012 Ashwani
Been Filed. Vs. Rajinder Singh and Another ..... Appellants
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
Bindal Present: Mr.Ram Avtar Yadav, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr.D.D.Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal, J By filing the present appeal, the landowners are seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Along with the appeal,
“by Filing an Application in Accordance with Law the Vs. Housing Boa ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
the plot does not create any right in favour of the applicant. It was held as under:- “By filing an application in accordance with law, the applicant only gets a right of consideration of his application, but
In Filing the Appeal. Vs. Raj Kumar and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
appellant. ******* RAJIVE BHALLA, J. CRM-45831-2013 Prayer in this application is to condone delay of 510 days in filing the appeal. Counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that in view of a Full Bench judgment in CRM-A-547-MA-2011 titled
“perusal of File Reveals That Vide Application Dated 28.10.2013 Plai ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
brevity “the plaintiff”.), is to the impugned order dated 21.2.2014 (Annexure P2), by means of which, the application, filed by respondent-defendant Kewal Krishan son of Mool Chand (for short “the defendant”.), to lead additional evidence was accepted
“file Is Presented. Parties Were Called. Respondent and Applicant Ar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-05-2014
by the Assistant Collector on 08.08.2005 along with the application for condonation of delay of 22 months in filing an appeal. Such application was dismissed by the Collector on 07.03.2008. It was found that the Naksha ‘baa’
by Filing Cwp No. 7807 of 2013 the Appellant Had Laid Vs. Mahabir Sing ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-19-2014
No.3904 of 2013 : After hearing counsel for the parties, application is allowed. Delay of 107 days in filing this appeal stands condoned. LPA No.1539 of 2013 : By filing CWP No.7807 of 2013, the appellant had
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free