File - Judgment Search Results
Pollard's Lessee Vs. Files
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1844
Pollard's Lessee v. Files - 43 U.S. 591 (1844) U.S. Supreme Court Pollard's Lessee v. Files, 43 U.S. 2 How. 591 591
Southern Filed Ventures (P) Ltd., vs Smt.Beenakumari S.,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-01-2023
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 5307 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: SOUTHERN FILED VENTURES (P) LTD., MERCHISTEN ESTATE, PONMUDI P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 551, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY ADVS. N.ANILKUMAR
“heard. Judicial File Perused. Applicant Vs. VipIn Kumar and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
for the petitioner. Mr.Gulzar Mohd. Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms.Harsimrat Rai, DAG, Punjab. **** SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.P.C.') challenging the order
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“perusal of File Reveals That the Star Witness of This Case Vs. Amar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa Present:- Ms.Naiya Gill, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant --- Jasbir Singh, J. This application has been filed under Section 378 (4) Cr.P.C.seeking leave to file an appeal against judgment dated 11.1.2012 vide which respondents No.2
Been Filed. Vs. Rajinder Singh and Another ..... Appellants
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
acquired land. Along with the appeal, an application for condonation of delay of 4,179 days has also been filed. Briefly the facts are that vide notification dated 6.5.1992 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act,
“by Filing an Application in Accordance with Law the Vs. Housing Boa ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
second appeal, aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby the suit for injunction filed by the plaintiff was dismissed. The suit is for allotment of the tenement meant for Middle Income Group
In Filing the Appeal. Vs. Raj Kumar and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
Bench judgment in CRM-A-547-MA-2011 titled as “Tata Steel LTD.versus M/s Atma Tube Products Ltd.”., the appeal against acquittal filed before the Additional Sessions Judge, was withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court,
“perusal of File Reveals That Vide Application Dated 28.10.2013 Plai ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
brevity “the plaintiff”.), is to the impugned order dated 21.2.2014 (Annexure P2), by means of which, the application, filed by respondent-defendant Kewal Krishan son of Mool Chand (for short “the defendant”.), to lead additional evidence was accepted
“file Is Presented. Parties Were Called. Respondent and Applicant Ar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-05-2014
‘baa’ shall remain same. After partition, the naksha ‘baa’ be called after sending a message to girdawar. The file after preparation of amended naksha ‘baa’ be presented on 29.08.2005.”. Consequent to the said order, the Instrument of
by Filing Cwp No. 7807 of 2013 the Appellant Had Laid Vs. Mahabir Sing ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-19-2014
correct and accordingly, above order was passed. Further challenge was made to an order dated 25.8.2009, dismissing appeal filed by him. In his writ petition, it is primary grievance of the appellant Kumar Ashwani 2014.05.30 12:05 I
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free