Fiat - Judgment Search Results

Fiat India Automobiles Ltd. Vs.uoi and Anr.

Court: Delhi

HINDUSTAN MOTORS LIMITED COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. + W.P.(C) 7417/2014, CM APPL. 17608/2014 + W.P.(C) 7638/2014 FIAT INDIA AUTOMOBILES LTD. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus BMW INDIA PVT LTD. versus THE COMPETITION COMMISSION OF

Fiat India Private Limited Vs. Rahul Udyog Viniog Limited and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: II(2004)BC101,(2003)3CALLT381(HC)

Matched in: Parties Fiat India Private Limited Vs. Rahul Udyog Viniog Limited and anr.

Fiat India (P) Ltd. Vs. Dr. Zahid HussaIn Gillani

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: AIR2003J& K71,2003(2)JKJ95

Matched in: Parties Fiat India (P) Ltd. Vs. Dr. Zahid HussaIn Gillani

Fiat India Automobiles Limited Vs. Virendra Singh, Assistant Commissio ...

Court: Mumbai

The Commissioner of Income Tax10, Mumbai. (Through Proper Channel) Sir, Sub: Order u/s 127(2) in the case of Fiat India Automobiles Ltd. Ref:No.C.I.T.-10/Juris.1237/Transfer/2011-12 dated 22.11.2011-reg. Kindly refer to the above, 2 Order u/s. 127(2)was passed in the

New Holland Fiat (India) Pvt. Ltd. Formerly Known as Fiat India Pvt. L ...

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Complainant no. 2/respondent no.2 has paid Rs.1,50,000/- to respondent no.3/opposite party no. 2 on 11-1-1999 for purchase of FIAT UNO car and requested to get registered Fiat car in the name of his mother Smt. Tara Bai.

M/S. Fiat India Automobiles Ltd. Vs. K. Venugopal and Another

Court: Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Panchkula

1. Delay of 96 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 2. This appeal has been preferred by Fiat India Automobiles Limited (appellant herein) against the order dated June 28th, 2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes

Fiat India P. Ltd. and Premier Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(167)ELT82Tri(Mum.)bai

together and disposed of by this common order.2. Duty demand of Rs. 311,16,49,260/- has been confirmed on M/s. Fiat India for the period April, 1998 to June 2001 and a demand of Rs. 49,28,80,265/- on M/s. Premier

Fiat India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

have taken over liabilities of UNO car model and started manufacturing the cars. It is their contention that Fiat India Ltd., the present appellants, have not taken over any liability in regard to 'Padmini' car manufactured by

Fiat India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)(193)ELT126Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Parties Fiat India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Fiat India P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

arising from the same issue are being disposed off by this common order after hearing both sides.1.2 M/s Fiat India Pvt. Ltd previously known as M/s. India Auto Ltd (herein after referred to as Fiat) are the