Fera - Judgment Search Results
Shri Pukhraj Ganeshmal JaIn Vs. Enforcement Director (Fera) Government ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-01-1998
Reported in: 1999(5)BomCR336; 1999CriLJ1776; 1999(1)MhLj863
India and abroad. As regards the seizure of gold bars etc. in addition to section 37 of the FERA, 1973, section 38 of the said Act empowers any officers of Enforcement, without prejudice to the provisions of
Dukhishyam Benupani, Asstt. Director, Enforcement Directorate (Fera) V ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-28-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD(Cri)86; [1998]91CompCas413(SC); 1998CriLJ841; JT1997(9)SC379; 1997(6)SCALE351; (1998)1SCC52; [1997]Supp5SCR566
in the residential premises of the respondent. So they issued summons to the respondent under Section 40 of FERA to appear before the officials at New Delhi. But the respondent, instead of appearing in response to the
Telco Ltd. Vs. Dir. of Enforcement of the Fera Board
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-20-1999
Reported in: 2000(68)ECC253; 2000(115)ELT618(Bom)
letter of credit with the Bank of Baroda who are, admittedly, authorised agents under the provisions of the FERA, 1973. On 9-7-1974 the Customs Authority held that the appellants had exceeded the limit under the import licence
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pyarasaheb Kesarisingh Rana Vs. B.K. Solanki, Dy. Director, Fera
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-25-1986
Reported in: 1988(37)ELT539(Bom)
Matched in: Parties Pyarasaheb Kesarisingh Rana Vs. B.K. Solanki, Dy. Director, Fera
Pyarsaheb Kesarisingh Rana Vs. B.K. Solanki, Dy. Director, Fera
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-25-1986
Reported in: 1990(27)ECC66
order as to costs. Appeal - Order by Special Director stating the order to be appealable to the FERA Board--Subsequent letter from Special Director that it was erroneously stated that the order was appealable and requiring the
Paramjit Singh Vs. the Chief Enforcement Officer (Enforcement Director ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-17-1996
Reported in: [1999]95CompCas423b(Kar); 1998CriLJ915; ILR1997KAR1410; 1998(2)KarLJ614
respondent, without authority of law and without complying with the provisions of Sections 37 and 38 of the FERA, illegally conducted the raid of his residential and office premises and seized several documents including the computer machine.3.
Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate (Fera) Ministry of Finance ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-1996
Reported in: 1998(4)ALD540; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)272; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)552; [1999]96CompCas745(AP)
1. This appeal is directedby the complainant against the judgment dated 6-4-1993 acquitting the accused for the offence under Section 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) punishable under Section 56 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (for short...
Mrs. Dr. Tapati Sengupta and Ms. Amgana Sengupta Vs. Enforcement Offic ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-13-1997
Reported in: 1998(60)ECC48
writ proceedings, is, whether Section 40(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1973 (hereinafter referred to as FERA) and Section 34(2) of FERA are ultra vires the Constitution of India and is illegal, invalid and null
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free