Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Fenceful - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 23 2024

Carmmel Fencing Company vs the Divisional Forest Officer

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-23-2024

MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 3RD MAGHA, 1945 PETITIONERS: 1 CARMMEL FENCING COMPANY, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, KALLAUMKADAVU, PATANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA - 689695. 2 SHIJU G, AGED 42 YEARS,


Jan 31 2023

Kerala Fencing Association vs the Secretary General

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-31-2023

TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 11TH MAGHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 2181 OF 2020 PETITIONER/S: KERALA FENCING ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M. S. PAVANAN, COBANK TOWER, GOLDEN JUBILEE ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI - 682 017.


Jan 08 2014

Madhya Pradesh Fencing Association Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Jud ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-08-2014

is as to which team should be permitted to participate in the ongoing 15 th Sub Junior National Fencing Championship 2013-14 to be held in Cuttack. It seems that there is certain dispute with regard to the


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 21 2005

Steel and Fence Corporation Vs. Commr. of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Dec-21-2005

Reported in: (2006)(105)ECC275

1. Heard Shri B.N. Chattopadhyay, ld.Consultant on the stay petition filed by the appellants. He submits that in this case the duty involved of Rs. Page 0276 11,307/- + Rs. 15,323/- = Rs. 26,630/- has been...


Mar 23 1903

Kokomo Fence Machine Co. Vs. Kitselman

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-23-1903

Kokomo Fence Machine Co. v. Kitselman - 189 U.S. 8 (1903) U.S. Supreme Court Kokomo Fence Machine Co. v. Kitselman,


Feb 22 1991

K. Murugan Vs. Fencing Association of India, Jabalpur and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-22-1991

Reported in: JT1991(1)SC676; 1991(1)SCALE259; (1991)2SCC412; [1991]1SCR659; 1991(1)LC589(SC)

(arising SLPs 1599 and 1787/91). Not content with the litigation in the Delhi and Madras High Courts, the Fencing Association of India filed a civil suit at Jabalpur asking for declaration that Shri Shukla had been duly


Mar 15 2023

K. Chandrakumar vs Fencing Association of India

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-15-2023

P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695030 BY ADVS.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) K.SUDHINKUMAR SABU PULLAN GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: 1 FENCING ASSOCIATION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY GENERAL, 605, 6TH FLOOR, DLF COURTYARD, DISTRICT CENTRE, SAKET, NEW DELHI,


Sep 07 1990

B.S. Adityan and ors. Vs. Fencing Association of India, Jabalpur and o ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-07-1990

Reported in: AIR1991MP316; 1991(0)MPLJ418

a photostat copy of which was placed before us during course of arguments.5. In the meanwhile, on 27-6-1990 Fencing Association of India and' its Secretary General, respondents Nos. 1 and 2. herein, filed a Civil Suit (Annexure-K)


Aug 01 2012

State of Karnataka Vs. Nature Fence and Others

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on: Aug-01-2012

the complainant are these. The State of Karnataka, the complainant issued a Tender Notification for providing solar wire fencing inOnkarand Maddur Border Area which is a forest area of BandipurNational Park and the Tender was awarded infavourof


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial