appellant that appellant had applied for and obtained permission for clearance of semi-finished goods i.e. floor coverings or felt falling under sub-heading 5702.20 and 5702.90, under Rule 56B of the Central Excise Rules, from their factory for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Nov 20 1990

Swadeshi Felt Manufacturers and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Nov-20-1990

Reported in: 1991(32)ECC276

very outset that so far as the liability of the petitioners for payment of excise duty on woollen felts which the petitioners used to manufacture is concerned, it is no longer res Integra in view of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1978

Rajasthan Felts Manufacturing Co. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jan-25-1978

Reported in: [1980]45STC274(Raj)

M.L. Shrimal, J.1. The petitioner, M/s. Rajasthan Felts Manufacturing Company, is a partnership firm engaged in the business of manufacturing woollen felts, etc. It is a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1978

Rajasthan Felts Manufacturing Company Vs. the State of Rajasthan and o ...

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jan-25-1978

Reported in: 1978(11)WLN76

M.L. Shrimal, J.1. The petitioner M/s Rajasthan Felts Manufacturing Company is a partnership firm engaged in the business of manufacturing woollen felts etc It is a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 1993

United Felts and Carpets Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-15-1993

Reported in: (1996)(81)ELT609TriDel

that the appellants had applied for and obtained permission for the clearance of semi-finished goods i.e.floor coverings of felt falling under sub-heading 5702.20 and 5702.90 CET from their factory for the purpose of latexing at the factory

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1995

United Felt Carpets Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-06-1995

Reported in: (1995)LC545Tri(Delhi)

by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of non-woven felt fabric having the code names FFBW-1, FFB-1 and FFB-2. The FFBW-1 variety is a non-woven felt fabric made

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1998

Chopra Felt Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-1998

Reported in: (1999)(105)ELT394TriDel

5,000/- and Rs. 2,500/- has been imposed on the 2 appellants herein respectively. In the matter of Chopra Felt the seized goods have also been confiscated and fine of Rs. 560 has also been imposed in lieu

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1939