Favorite - Judgment Search Results

Favorite Industries and 2 ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 2 ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2008(222)ELT364(Guj); (2006)1GLR846

d a mehta j 1 heard mr dhaval shah for mr hardik modh learned advocate for the petitioners and mr...

Bda Breweries and Distilleries Ltd. Vs. Shree Durga Distillery

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2002(25)PTC704(Karn)

..... permanent injunction restraining the defendant from using the name officers favorite in relation to alcoholic beverages in any manner or any ..... temporary injunction restraining the respondent from using the name officers favorite in relation to alcoholic beverages which is similar to ..... and sells the whisky under the name and style officers favorite with four stars and that the respondent has developed .....

County of Allegheny Vs. Aclu

Court: US Supreme Court

..... advances religion the court s subsequent decisions have variously spoken in terms of endorsement favoritism preference or promotion the essential principle remains the same the clause at the very ..... j concurring the fullest realization of true religious liberty requires that government effect no favoritism among sects or between religion and nonreligion moreover the term endorsement is closely linked .....

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the appearance of corruption extends only to those contributions that actually create corrupt donor favoritism among officeholders post at 16 this latter formulation would render congress interest in stemming ..... successfully and to distinguish good political responsiveness from bad that is quid pro quo favoritism and influence are not as the government s theory suggests avoidable in representative .....

Liteky Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... source and absent such reliance they require recusal only when they evidence such deepseated favoritism or antagonism as would make fair judgment impossible second opinions formed by the judge ..... an extrajudicial source and can only in the rarest circumstances evidence the degree of favoritism or antagonism required as discussed below when no extrajudicial source is involved almost invariably .....

Hitendrasingh S/O Bhupendrasingh and Others Vs. Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

..... should be complete transparency and openness in such matters if there is any scope for favoritism manipulation nepotism or corruption in the selection process or thereafter in making appointments that ..... of any individual appointment being in issue when there was complaint of large scale manipulation favoritism illegality and irregularity in the selection process and that was being inquired by the .....

Hitendrasingh S/O Bhupendrasingh and Others Vs. Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

..... should be complete transparency and openness in such matters if there is any scope for favoritism manipulation nepotism or corruption in the selection process or thereafter in making appointments that ..... of any individual appointment being in issue when there was complaint of large scale manipulation favoritism illegality and irregularity in the selection process and that was being inquired by the .....

Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. Vs. Grumet

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the larkin court recognized although it did not discuss the specific possibility of legislative favoritism along religious lines because the statute before it delegated state authority to any ..... by common religious belief and practice in a manner that fails to foreclose religious favoritism it therefore crosses the line from permissible accommodation to impermissible establishment the judgment of .....

Capitol Square Review and Advisory Bd. Vs. Pinette

Court: US Supreme Court

..... our cases have accordingly equated endorsement with promotion or favoritism allegheny supra at 593 citing cases we find it ..... a negative prohibition against certain narrowly defined forms of government favoritism see ante at 766 it also imposes affirmative obligations ..... point at which the government becomes responsible whether due to favoritism toward or disregard for the evident effect of religious .....

Cornelius Vs. Naacp Leg. Def. Fund

Court: US Supreme Court

..... access to the cfc in order to avoid the reality and the appearance of government favoritism or entanglement with particular viewpoints in such circumstances petitioner contends that the decision to deny ..... s conclusion that participation by such agencies in the cfc will create the appearance of favoritism the court of appeals rejection of the government s interest in avoiding controversy that would .....