Fastening - Judgment Search Results
Sundaram Fasteners Limited Vs. S.Venkatesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2014
AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL O.S.A.No.337 of 2013 and O.S.A.No.291 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 *** Sundaram Fasteners Limited Represented by its Executive Director & Secretary - Mr.V.G.Jaganathan No.98-A, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004..Appellant/Applicant/Plaintiff in
Sundram Fasteners Ltd., Vs Special Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-03-2026
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP No.13278 of 2020 Sundram Fasteners Ltd., Metal Forms Division, Harita, Hosur, Rep. by its Chief Financial Officer, ..Petitioner Vs1. Special Officer/ Asst. Director
M K Fasteners vs Mr D Siddaraju
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 11739 OF 2021 (L-TER) BETWEEN: M K FASTENERS 221, 3RD STAGE, BOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL AREA HOSUR ROAD, BENGALURU 560099, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MR KIRTAN KUMTAL
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Atul Fasteners Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-02-2004
Reported in: (2007)7VST274(P& H)
62,47,500 from April 30, 1997. The said order is as follows : It is certified that M/s. Atul Fasteners Ltd., having its manufacturing unit located at C-45, Industrial Area, Phase 3, Mohali District, Ropar, in area Group
Pearl Fasteners Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2004
Reported in: 115(2004)DLT515
R.S. Sodhi, J.1. This appeal seeks to challenge the judgment dated 26.9.1998 of the Additional District Judge, Delhi in S.No.519/95 whereby the learned Judge has made the award of the Arbitrator, Rule of the Court.2. Facts...
Sang Fasteners (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-24-1988
Reported in: 1988(17)LC315(Bombay); 1988(36)ELT591(Bom)
1. The petitioners are manufacturers of products known as nuts bolts and screws which are covered by Tariff Item No. 52 of the Central Excises and Salt Act. Between the period from 1st April, 1975 to...
S.S. Fasteners Vs. Satya Paul Verma
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-11-2000
Reported in: AIR2000P& H301; (2000)126PLR598
of the awarded amount.3. The facts of Civil Revision 2534 of 1999, in brief, are that M/s. S.S. Fasteners (plaintiff) filed a suit against Sat Paul Verma (defendant) for permanent injunction restraining him from Interfering in the
Sundaram Fasteners Limited and ors. Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-1988
Reported in: (1989)1MLJ72
urban land tax. The petitioners in these four petitions belong to one group of companies, known as Sundaram Fasteners Ltd., Padi, Madras-50. The prayer of the petitioner in W.P.No 4172 of 1982 reads as follows:To issue a
Sundaram Fasteners Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-1998
Reported in: [2001]247ITR219(Mad)
Janarthanam, J.1. The assessee--Sundaram Fasteners Ltd., Madras, is a company, in which the public are substantially interested. The assessment year involved is 1982-83,
Sara Fasteners and Grip Industries (P) Limited, by Its Managing Direct ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-1988
Reported in: (1989)2MLJ97
ORDERSrinivasan, J.1. This appeal is against an order passed by the District Judge, North Arcot at Vellore, under the provisions of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1981 directing the sale of mortgaged properties. There is no...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free