Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: faridabad development corporation act 1956 section 1 short title Sorted by: recent Page 100 of about 52,000 results (0.482 seconds)

Sep 07 2021 (SC)

T.v. Ramakrishna Reddy Vs. M. Mallappa

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... by filing written statement. it is the defendant no.1 s case that the suit was not maintainable for want of notice under section 64 of the bangalore development authority act, 1976. it is its further case that the khata issued in the name of the plaintiff appellant is only a revenue entry and does not confer any ..... claims that he had mortgaged the 11 suit property for taking loan from one financial institution. he further claimed that an endorsement was also issued by the corporation of city of bangalore that khata regarding the suit property is transferred to the appellant. according to the plaintiff appellant, when the bangalore mahanagar palike withdrew the ..... be relevant to refer to the following observations made therein: 3. it is evident from the plain reading of the above that any entry made in the corporation register by fraud, misrepresentation or suppression of facts or by furnishing false, incorrect and incomplete material could be corrected within a period of three years from the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2021 (SC)

M/s Indsil Hydro Power And Manganese Limited Vs. State Of Kerala And O ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... unconscionable or arbitrary on merits, reference may also be made to the following statement of law culled out in rajasthan state industrial development and investment corporation and another vs. diamond and gem development corporation limited and another10:- 15. a party cannot be permitted to blow hot-blow cold , fast and loose or approbate and reprobate ..... commissioner, hindu religious endowments, madras v. sri lakshmindra thirtha swamiar of sri shirur mutt13 the vires of the madras hindu religious and charitable endowments act, 1951 (madras act 19 of 1951), came to be examined. amongst the sections challenged was section 76(1). under this section every religious institution had to pay ..... others vs. steel authority of india and others29, certain questions concerning royalty as determined under the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 now stand referred to a bench of nine judges, which reference is still pending consideration. however, none of those issues .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2021 (SC)

Supertech Ltd Vs. Emerald Court Owner Resident Welfare Association

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... demolish such constructions but also to impose a penalty on the wrongdoers involved. this lament of this court, over the brazen violation of building regulations by developers acting in collusion with planning bodies, was brought to the fore-front when the court prefaced its judgment with the following observations: 1. in the last ..... regularisation of illegal constructions by way of compounding and otherwise. finally, the court also observed that no case has been made out for directing the municipal corporation to regularize a construction which has been made in violation of the sanctioned plan and cautioned against doing so. in that context, it held: 56 ..... an expert agency on the issue and engage an expert for this purpose. on the submission of the additional solicitor general, the national buildings construction 20 corporation limited , a government owned enterprise, was appointed to examine various facts in relation to the dispute, particularly those having a bearing on whether the two .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2021 (HC)

K R Sagar Grama Panchayat Vs. Shri V Harish

Court : Karnataka

..... the petitions are not filed by the board, or on behalf of them, and that in the light of section 6(2) of the act, the fund is body corporate which shall by the said name sue and be sued according to him, petitioners are not aggrieved 14 persons because, even in a pecuniary ..... belagola hobli, srirangapatna taluk, mandya district in favour of the petitioner. in writ petition no.9233/2021 between k.r.sagar grama panchayat krishnarajasagar, represented by its panchayat development officer srirangapatna taluk mandya district 571 607. ... petitioner (by sri b.j.somayaji, advocate, (video conferencing)) 3 and1 shri v. harish s/o d.venkataraman ..... , srirangapatna taluk, mandya district 571 607.2. the secretary k.r.sagara grama panchayat, k.r.sagara, srirangapatna taluk, mandya district 571 607. 23. panchayat development officer k.r.sagara grama panchayat, k.r.sagara, srirangapatna taluk, mandya district 571 607.4. the president srirangaptna taluk panchayat, srirangapatna, mandya district 571 438. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2021 (HC)

Sri V Harish Vs. The President

Court : Karnataka

..... the petitions are not filed by the board, or on behalf of them, and that in the light of section 6(2) of the act, the fund is body corporate which shall by the said name sue and be sued according to him, petitioners are not aggrieved 14 persons because, even in a pecuniary ..... belagola hobli, srirangapatna taluk, mandya district in favour of the petitioner. in writ petition no.9233/2021 between k.r.sagar grama panchayat krishnarajasagar, represented by its panchayat development officer srirangapatna taluk mandya district 571 607. ... petitioner (by sri b.j.somayaji, advocate, (video conferencing)) 3 and1 shri v. harish s/o d.venkataraman ..... , srirangapatna taluk, mandya district 571 607.2. the secretary k.r.sagara grama panchayat, k.r.sagara, srirangapatna taluk, mandya district 571 607. 23. panchayat development officer k.r.sagara grama panchayat, k.r.sagara, srirangapatna taluk, mandya district 571 607.4. the president srirangaptna taluk panchayat, srirangapatna, mandya district 571 438. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 2021 (HC)

Sri Nitesh Shetty Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... few of which, germane for consideration of the present lis, are extracted for the purpose of ready reference:19. the apex court in the case of indian oil corporation v. nepc india limited2, has held as follows:- re: point (i) 12. the principles relating to exercise of jurisdiction under section 482 of the code of ..... commenced proceedings on 23.03.2017. after participating in arbitration proceedings, the complainant registers a complaint on 08.09.2017 alleging that the acts of petitioners amounted to violation and breach of joint development agreement, which is a criminal breach of trust and cheating for having misappropriated certain funds. the complaint resulted in registration of an fir ..... with the intention of cheating us, and making us to believe that they were acting in terms of the agreement, mobilized rs.17,72,00,000/- [rupees seventeen crores seventeen two lakhs only]. from the sale of built-up area to a corporate entity called m/s bccl and it is placed on record that we were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2021 (HC)

Wipro Limited Vs. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

Court : Karnataka

..... use or retention of money; refund due & payable to an assessee is a debt owed; parliament has enacted this principle in section 244a of the 1961 act; in aluminium corporation of india ltd. v uoi1978(2) elt452(sc) the apex court observed that a good government involves not only diligent collection of taxes, but also ready ..... be fair & reasonable in dealing with the subjects and it must avoid any harassment to the assessee public, without causing any loss to the exchequer (see nokia corporation v. director of income-tax [2007]. 292 itr22(delhi hc); the state as constitutionally ordained, needs to conduct itself as a virtuous litigant and should meet honest ..... 3. issue of depreciation of software was allowed in favour of assessee.4. issue of allocation of corporate expenses between eligible and non eligible units was allowed in favour of assessee.5. issue of computation of profits of overseas development centre (odc), was remitted to the record of ao and assessee was directed to file relevant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2021 (SC)

Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation Vs. Power Mech Projects ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 2 bank of baroda 2 catholic syrian bank ltd. (including vijaya bank and dena bank) 3 bank of india 3 city union bank ltd. 4 bank of maharashtra 4 development credit bank ltd. 5 canara bank 5 dhanlaxmi bank ltd. (including syndicate bank) 6 central bank of india 6 federal bank ltd. 7 indian bank 7 hdfc bank ..... in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal nos. 4936-4937 of 2021 (arising out of slp(c) nos. 11476-11477 of2021 sepco electric power construction corporation ...appellant(s) versus power mech projects ltd. .respondent(s) judgment indira banerjee, j.leave granted.2. these appeals are against a judgment and order dated 27.11 ..... the credibility of icbc within the indian commercial market.52. in the second schedule to the rbi act, icbc is listed in the same category of scheduled foreign banks in india as standard chartered bank, citi bank, american express banking corporation, hsbc limited etc. which are household names in india in the arena of banking. on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2021 (HC)

Smt. S. Jalaja Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... of the 1966 act provides for constitution of the board, whereas, section 7 of the 1966 act deals with terms of office and conditions of service for members ..... to be an industrial area for the purposes of 1966 act. section 4 of the 1966 act empowers the state government to alter the industrial area by including or excluding any area from industrial area. section 5 of the act deals with establishment and incorporation of karnataka industrial areas development board, which is a body corporate having perpetual succession and a common seal. section 6 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2021 (HC)

D Ranganatha Rao Dead By Lrs Vs. Smt D Sujatha

Court : Karnataka

..... 3rd cross7anjaneya temple street nagasandra bangalore 9.6. d.s.sridhar s/o late d.srinivasa rao major c/o. food corporation of india mission road bangalore 27.7. d.s.padmaja s/o late d.srinivsa rao major r/at sports authority of ..... 3rd cross anjaneya temple street nagasandra bangalore 9.6. d.s.sridhar s/o late d.srinivasa rao major c/o. food corporation of india mission road bangalore 27.7. d.s.padmaja s/o late d.srinivsa rao major r/at sports authority of ..... of the court in totality. this legal position is already decided in the following decisions: (i) in the case of delhi development authority vs. bhola nath sharma reported 45 in air2011sc438 where the supreme court summarily dismissed the special leave petition without going into ..... which clause (ii) of section 29-a of the act became applicable. this intervening event which gave shares to respondents 2 to 5 had the effect of varying shares of the parties like any supervening development. since the legislation is beneficial and placed on the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //