Fantasy - Judgment Search Results
M/S Fantasy Builders vs Harsha C
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
OF 2015 (MV-I) C/W MFA CROSS OBJECTION NO. 92 OF 2022 (MV-I) IN MFA No. 4394/2015 BETWEEN: M/S FANTASY BUILDERS AND ENGINEERS PVT. LTD., SN PRIDE COMPLEX, NO.5/6, I CROSS, MADIWALA NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 068 REPRESENTED BY
Fantasy Fashion Vs. Asim Kumar Sinha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2012
It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner and respondent were initially partners in the firm Fantasy Fashion. Further as per petitioner, on 18.03.2005 respondent requested M/s Sawhney Brothers that the amount due to Fantasy
Fantasy Sales Corporation vs Assistant Commissioner Special Circle-1
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-09-2020
JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 WP(C).No.27422 OF 2020(C) PETITIONER: FANTASY SALES CORPORATION MANAGING PARTNER N.SAHAL. BY ADVS. SRI.P.RAGHUNATH SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN RESPONDENT: ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SPECIAL CIRCLE-1 STATE GOODS AND
18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S. Fantasy Collections vs Mathew Sebastian
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-30-2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 89/2010 of SUB COURT, PALA DATED 22-08-2011 APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 4:M/S. FANTASY COLLECTIONS REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER JOSE GEORGE S/O. GEORGE JOSEPH, AGED 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT MAROTTICKAL HOUSE, BHARANANGANAM
Madhu Fantasy Land Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai and anr. Vs. Maharashtra General ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-20-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR692; [2002(95)FLR245]; (2002)IIILLJ587Bom; 2002(3)MhLj534
Matched in: Parties Madhu Fantasy Land Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai and anr. Vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union, Mumbai and anr.
Madhu Fantasy Land Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Mar-23-2005
Reported in: (2005)62SCL116SAT
Matched in: Parties Madhu Fantasy Land Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry
Fogerty Vs. Fantasy, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-01-1994
Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. - 510 U.S. 517 (1994) OCTOBER TERM, 1993 Syllabus FOGERTY v. FANTASY, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
Federation Of Indian Fantasy Sports (fifs) Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-14-2022
THE CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE ENSHRINED IN PART XI OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P.NO.22371/2021: BETWEEN:1. FEDERATION OF INDIAN FANTASY SPORTS (FIFS) INNOV8, REGAL BUILDING, 69, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI11000, INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MR
Virendra Kapoor Proprietor Fantasy Lights Vs. Airports Authority of In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2009
Reported in: 158(2009)DLT530
of the contract was kept in abeyance. It was then decided to allow the existing licensee viz. M/s Fantasy Lights who is also one of the participant in the above tenders to continue on payment of licence
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free