Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Fantasied - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 27 2026

M/S Fantasy Builders vs Harsha C

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-27-2026

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4394 OF 2015 (MV-I) C/W MFA CROSS OBJECTION NO. 92...


May 17 2012

Fantasy Fashion Vs. Asim Kumar Sinha

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2012

PRATIBHA RANI, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner, who is an accused in Complaint Case no.1541/1 of 2005 under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, has impugned the order dated 10.10.2011 passed in Criminal Revision No.202/2011. 2. Vide...


Dec 09 2020

Fantasy Sales Corporation vs Assistant Commissioner Special Circle-1

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Dec-09-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 WP(C).No.27422 OF 2020(C) PETITIONER: FANTASY SALES CORPORATION MANAGING PARTNER N.SAHAL. BY...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 30 2019

M/S. Fantasy Collections vs Mathew Sebastian

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-30-2019

“C R”IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 9TH JYAISHTA, 1941 RFA.No.111 of 2012 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS...


Feb 20 2002

Madhu Fantasy Land Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai and anr. Vs. Maharashtra General ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-20-2002

Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR692; [2002(95)FLR245]; (2002)IIILLJ587Bom; 2002(3)MhLj534

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. The petitioners have challenged the order of the Industrial Court dated 21-7-1999 whereby it has come to the conclusion that the petitioners have engaged in an unfair labour practice under Item 6 of...


Mar 23 2005

Madhu Fantasy Land Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Mar-23-2005

Reported in: (2005)62SCL116SAT

1. All the appeals are taken up together since they arise out of single impugned order and a common order is passed by consent for parties.2. The appellants challenge the impugned order passed by SEBI dated...


Mar 01 1994

Fogerty Vs. Fantasy, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-01-1994

Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. - 510 U.S. 517 (1994) OCTOBER TERM, 1993 Syllabus FOGERTY v. FANTASY, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 92-1750. Argued December 8, 1993-Decided March...


Feb 14 2022

Federation Of Indian Fantasy Sports (fifs) Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-14-2022

- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT WRIT...


Jan 21 2009

Virendra Kapoor Proprietor Fantasy Lights Vs. Airports Authority of In ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-21-2009

Reported in: 158(2009)DLT530

Madan B. Lokur, J.1. The important question for consideration relates to the circumstances in which a single bid can be rejected and re-tendering ordered. In our opinion, when there is intrinsic evidence (as in this case)...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial