Famous - Judgment Search Results
Famous Buildmart Private Limited. Vs. Unknown
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 AND IN THE MATTER OF : Scheme of Amalgamation of FAMOUS BUILDMART PRIVATE LIMITED...Petitioner Company-1/Transferor Company-1 AND NOBLE REALCo.PRIVATE LIMITED...Petitioner Company-2/Transferor Company-2 AND PRESENT BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED...Petitioner Company-3/Transferor Company
Famous Realtors, Operating IT’S Business as Hotel Travancore Court v ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-01-2023
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1944 APPLICANT: FAMOUS REALTORS, OPERATING IT'S BUSINESS AS HOTEL TRAVANCORE COURT HOTEL TRAVANCORE COURT REGISTERED OFFICE, WARRIAM ROAD, ERNAKULAM - 682016
Famous Construction Vs. National Projects Construction Corporation Lim ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2000
Reported in: 2000IIIAD(Delhi)581; AIR2000Delhi404; 2000(53)DRJ330
Matched in: Parties Famous Construction Vs. National Projects Construction Corporation Limited.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Famous Cine Laboratory and Studio Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-18-1975
Reported in: [1975]36STC104(Bom)
under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made at the instance of the applicants, the Famous Cine Laboratory and Studio Limited. The applicants are a public limited company and own a film studio and
Famous Cine Laboratories and Studios Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-t ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-07-1979
Reported in: (1979)13CTR(Bom)113; [1980]121ITR648(Bom); [1979]2TAXMAN6(Bom)
Desai J.1. The assessee in this reference is M/s. Famous Cina Laboratories & Studios Ltd. and will be hereinafter referred to as 'the company'. We are concerned in
Famous Textile Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-01-2005
Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT361Tri(Mum.)bai
effect - "15. In view of the above findings I hold that M/s. Bhagyalaxmi Processors Industries and M/s. Famous Textile Packers are jointly and severally liable to pay the duty of Rs. 5,46,12,662/- under Section 11A...." 2.
M/S.Famous Blue Metals, Rep.by Its Sole Proprietor Mukhtar Vs. the Uni ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-18-2011
Matched in: Parties M/S.Famous Blue Metals, Rep.by Its Sole Proprietor Mukhtar Vs. the United India Insurance Co.Ltd.
Famous Cine Laboratory Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-31-1996
Reported in: (1997)(71)LC884Tri(Mum.)bai
2. A demand of Rs. 47,600 was raised against the appellants in Form DD2 on the ground that certain air conditioners obtained under Chapter X of Central Excise Rules have been resold within a period of...
Cc Vs. Famous Auto Industries
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-03-1998
Reported in: (1998)(77)LC149Tri(Mum.)bai
Matched in: Parties Cc Vs. Famous Auto Industries
Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-24-1930
Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. v. United States - 282 U.S. 30 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. v.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free