Falling - Judgment Search Results

Shri MainuddIn S/O Shri Lal Khan Vs. Managing Director, U.P. State Roa ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2008(118)FLR81]

sabhajeet yadav j 1 the main question in controversy involved in this case is that whether the issue concluded at...

Smt. Avantika Aggarwal and ors. Vs. Sh. Vinod Kumar Yadav

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2008ACJ1989; 147(2008)DLT601

kailash gambhir j 1 by way of this appeal the appellants seek enhancement in the compensation the motor accident claims...

Panchamal Industrial Corporation Represented by Its Manager, Sri Laxma ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2008Kant177; 2009LC(NULL)788; ILR2008(3)Kar3815; 2008(5)KLJ283; 2008(4)KCCRSN292; 2008(5)AIRKarR464; AIR2008Kar177

orderd v shylendra kumar j 1 this writ petition is by a person who was forced to run from pillar...

National Insurance Company Vs. Jayashreeben Nandulal Nerkar (Patil) an ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2008)3GLR2004

..... that dispute is settled on adjudication it cannot be said that the amount of compensation falls due it is submitted by the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective appellants ..... the hon ble supreme court has categorically negatived the contention that the compensation does not fall due until after the commissioner s order under section 19 para 6 7 and 8 .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Kenaram Saha and Subhash Saha and

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (2008)301ITR171(Kol.)

..... not applicable in any case the assessee s case would squarely fall within the exception provided in the second proviso to section 40a ..... that the assessee not only was unable to prove that its case falls within any particular clause of rule 6dd but also could not ..... furnished its explanation on march 21 2006 claiming that its case falls within rule 6dd f ii the assessing officer rejected the assessee .....

Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: (2008)17VST465(MP)

..... and other business activity 30 it is contended by the respondents that the compensatory tax falls into two categories namely positive ingredients which ought to be there to constitute compensatory ..... impediments as directly and immediately hamper free flow of trade commerce and intercourse and therefore fall within the prohibition imposed under article 301 of the constitution unless the high court .....

Kottathala Handloom Weavers Indl. Co-op. Socy. Vs. Enforcement Officer ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2008(2)KLJ59; 2008(2)KLT486; (2008)IIILLJ101Ker

..... coverage establishments must be held to continue under coverage notwithstanding the fall in the employment strength however it is noted that the ..... shall continue to be governed by the act notwithstanding the fall in the employment strength section 1 5 says that it ..... an establishment shall remain a covered by one notwithstanding the fall in employment strength such a stipulation is essential for a proper .....

Gallagher (Valuation Officer) (Respondent) Vs. Church of Jesus Christ ...

Court: House of Lords

..... chapel hall or similar building used in connection with a place falling within paragraph a above for the purposes of the organisation ..... responsible for the conduct of public religious worship in a place falling within sub paragraph 1 a above and 8212 a is ..... constitute discrimination on grounds of religion however the alleged discrimination must fall 8220 within the ambit 8221 of a right protected by .....

Kottathala Handloom Weavers Industrial Co-Operative Society Ltd. and A ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [2008(118)FLR170]

..... the requirements to attract coverage establishments must be held to continue under coverage notwithstanding the fall in the employment strength however it is noted that the said view was not accepted ..... petitioners establishment continues to be covered under the provisions of the act notwithstanding the alleged fall in strength below 50 or below 20 15 these crl mcs cannot in these circumstances .....

The Commissioner of Custom and Central Excise Vs. India Glycols Ltd.

Court: Uttaranchal

Reported in: 2008(131)ECC51; 2008(157)LC51; 2008(230)ELT39(NULL)

..... of capital goods the same are reproduced hereunder d following goods falling within the schedule to the central excise tariff act 1985 5 ..... than of a kind used for refrigerating and air conditioning applications falling under heading nos 84 81 and 90 32 ix components spares ..... the goods specified against item i to viii above x refractories falling within chapter 69 e goods specified in the table in the .....