Falling - Judgment Search Results

Santa Fe Pacific R. Co. Vs. Fall

Court: US Supreme Court

..... v fall nos 108 109 argued january 24 1922 decided may ..... santa fe pacific r co v fall 259 u s 197 1922 u s supreme court santa fe pacific r co v fall 259 u s 197 1922 santa fe pacific railroad company .....

Southern Pacific R. Co. Vs. Fall

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1922 u s supreme court southern pacific r co v fall 257 u s 460 1922 southern pacific railroad company v fall no 60 submitted october 21 1921 decided january 3 1922 .....

Malayath Veetil Raman and ors. Vs. C. Krishnan Nambudripad (Dead) and

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1922Mad505; (1922)43MLJ354

walter salis schwabe kt k c c j 1 the district munsif held in this suit that the true construction...

Shib Dayal Vs. Meharban and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1923All1; 69Ind.Cas.981

..... some apparent conflict of opinion has referred these cases to a fall bench there are only two points which arise for our determination ..... present case furthermore the counsel for the appellant was driven to fall back on the omnibus clause 16 for suits for which no ..... informed the latest reported case of this court following the previous fall bench case 23 both on principle and the balance of authority .....

Sri Gadicherla Venkatanarasimha Rao Garu Vs. Nyapathy Subba Rao Pantul ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1923Mad376; 73Ind.Cas.991

..... freely attended by the public otherwise this will not be a trust for public purposes falling tinder section 92 civil procedure code 12 the trust for the spread of hinduism being too vague ..... for the advancement of religion and trusts for other purposes beneficial to the community not falling under any of the preceding heads leaving out those somewhat significant words of sir samuel .....

Mahboob Sirfraz Vanth Sri Rajah Parthasarathy Appa Rao Savai Asva Rao ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1922)43MLJ486

..... the will that the legacies are not to be paid till the fund falls in in this case there is no direction to be found that the ..... the expiration of one year from the testator s death or from the falling in of the reversionary fund viscount haldane l c was of opinion that ..... executor there is no reason why a suit by a legatee should not fall under article 123 the only reason given by the learned judges is .....

Minnesota Vs. Wisconsin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and wisconsin through st louis bay and up st louis river to the falls as surveyed in accordance with terms of above decree in 1921 page 258 ..... thence with such channel north and west of big island upstream to the falls the center of the pivot pier of the interstate bridge was found ..... of the st louis river beyond fond du lac and extending to the falls and which is not shown on the meade chart or map the .....

Oklahoma Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1818 but if the source of the arkansas river shall be found to fall north or south of latitude 42 then the line shall run from the ..... does not have a continuous or dependable volume of water it has a fall of 3 feet or more per mile and for long intervals the greater ..... the water rises it does so very rapidly and it falls in the same way the riverbed has a fall of more than 1 foot to the mile and .....

Sahib Dayal Vs. Meharban and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1923)ILR45All27

..... that applies in the present case furthermore the counsel for the appellant was driven to fall back on the omnibus clause 16 for suits for which no other limitation is hereby ..... it an instalment bond within the meaning of article 75 in our opinion the case falls under article 80 which governs a bond not herein expressly provided for in which case .....

Emperor Vs. Babus Rajani Kanta Bose and anr.,

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1922Cal515,71Ind.Cas.81

..... the disciplinary jurisdiction of the high court and his misconduct which falls within clause f of section 13 of the legal practitioners act ..... the disciplinary jurisdiction of the high court aid his misconduct winch falls within clause f of section 13 of the legal practitioners act ..... combating it 113 as regards the question whether these cases r fall under clause b or clause f of section 13 of the .....